DoctorWho Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 soap, theres a reason that the bookies have lennon from 16/1 to 3/1 to be first manager sacked.... he was refreshing at first with honesty but when things arent going his way he gets all pissy and moany. Â Those are the same bookies that have Celtic as odds on favourites for the title. Â Â ofcourse celtic are odds on... at this stage they should be favourites considering the money they have spent. Â They actually made a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members SiMania Posted September 8, 2010 Paid Members Share Posted September 8, 2010 But we sold our 2 best players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoctorWho Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 But we sold our 2 best players. Â Â did lennon HAVE to sell, i thought he would only sell if he wanted to...? so im assuming he thought he could do without mcgeady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_mole Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 soap, theres a reason that the bookies have lennon from 16/1 to 3/1 to be first manager sacked.... he was refreshing at first with honesty but when things arent going his way he gets all pissy and moany. Â Those are the same bookies that have Celtic as odds on favourites for the title. Â Â ofcourse celtic are odds on... at this stage they should be favourites considering the money they have spent. Â They actually made a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoctorWho Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 soap, theres a reason that the bookies have lennon from 16/1 to 3/1 to be first manager sacked.... he was refreshing at first with honesty but when things arent going his way he gets all pissy and moany. Â Those are the same bookies that have Celtic as odds on favourites for the title. Â Â ofcourse celtic are odds on... at this stage they should be favourites considering the money they have spent. Â They actually made a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FUM Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 But we sold our 2 best players.   did lennon HAVE to sell, i thought he would only sell if he wanted to...? so im assuming he thought he could do without mcgeady  No but that's hardly the point. Why is it sensible that Celtic are favourites to win the title when we have lose our two best players?  Seriously guys, any help with that ignore button would be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cum Doctor Posted September 8, 2010 Author Share Posted September 8, 2010 Probably best to just see the username and skim past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoctorWho Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 But we sold our 2 best players.   did lennon HAVE to sell, i thought he would only sell if he wanted to...? so im assuming he thought he could do without mcgeady  No but that's hardly the point. Why is it sensible that Celtic are favourites to win the title when we have lose our two best players?  Seriously guys, any help with that ignore button would be good.   who are the 2 players? mcgeady and who...?  rangers lost several players... boyd, the leagues top goalscorer for the past how many years...? i cant see how im not making sense here, this isnt bigoted..we have a squad of 15 or 16 senior players..celtic have near 30!!!! ur better equipped for a season, a campaign...especially with nothing but domestic football to focus on, u could field completely changed sides in cups and league...rangers cant without playing mostly reserves and youth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Maverick Posted September 8, 2010 Paid Members Share Posted September 8, 2010 But we sold our 2 best players.   did lennon HAVE to sell, i thought he would only sell if he wanted to...? so im assuming he thought he could do without mcgeady  No but that's hardly the point. Why is it sensible that Celtic are favourites to win the title when we have lose our two best players?  Seriously guys, any help with that ignore button would be good.   who are the 2 players? mcgeady and who...?  rangers lost several players... boyd, the leagues top goalscorer for the past how many years...? i cant see how im not making sense here, this isnt bigoted..we have a squad of 15 or 16 senior players..celtic have near 30!!!! ur better equipped for a season, a campaign...especially with nothing but domestic football to focus on, u could field completely changed sides in cups and league...rangers cant without playing mostly reserves and youth Although it's purely subjective, Artur Boruc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daaaaaad! Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 No but that's hardly the point. Why is it sensible that Celtic are favourites to win the title when we have lose our two best players? Seriously guys, any help with that ignore button would be good. Because you have a bigger squad, more money, a new manager and don't have any European football to distract from your domestic duties.  As much as it pains me to agree with DicktorWho, he has a single solitary good point when he says that Celtic should definitely be the favourites this season.  Apart from that mind, he's a bellend and considerably weakens any point I or any other Rangers fans dare to attempt to make for our team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stylin_and_Profilin Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 If true, then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aidancorrigan Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Ooooohhhhhh the same Aberdeen who spat on Mark Mcghee is it all rosey now that you got some players in?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members martyngnr Posted September 9, 2010 Paid Members Share Posted September 9, 2010 Ooooohhhhhh the same Aberdeen who spat on Mark Mcghee is it all rosey now that you got some players in?? ONE "fan" spat on Mark Mcghee. ONE. There was 8,153 people in the ground that night. I keep forgetting that Celtic fans are angels with absolutely no moronic element. Â Also, everything isn't rosy because we got some players in. It's a hell of a lot better because we got some players OUT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Ooooohhhhhh the same Aberdeen who spat on Mark Mcghee is it all rosey now that you got some players in?? ONE "fan" spat on Mark Mcghee. ONE. There was 8,153 people in the ground that night. To be fair, you did bring up the same kind of argument when you were going on about the Motherwell fans chanting at McGhee, remember? Â Despite the fact it was a small percentage of morons in the crowd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members martyngnr Posted September 9, 2010 Paid Members Share Posted September 9, 2010 Ooooohhhhhh the same Aberdeen who spat on Mark Mcghee is it all rosey now that you got some players in?? ONE "fan" spat on Mark Mcghee. ONE. There was 8,153 people in the ground that night. To be fair, you did bring up the same kind of argument when you were going on about the Motherwell fans chanting at McGhee, remember? Â Despite the fact it was a small percentage of morons in the crowd. Unlike yourself when that happened, you won't hear me defending the moron that did it. I'm not getting back into this one with you again as we will just end up in the same circular argument we did a year ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.