Paid Members DJ Kris Posted September 7, 2007 Paid Members Share Posted September 7, 2007 Is he still dead?Last I heard his ashes were due to appear on RAW as part of an angle involving the Undertaker's urnThe Undertaker still has the urn? Cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Carbomb Posted September 7, 2007 Paid Members Share Posted September 7, 2007 Is he still dead?Last I heard his ashes were due to appear on RAW as part of an angle involving the Undertaker's urnThe Undertaker still has the urn? Cool.Oh yes, he urned his spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbins Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 For fuck's sake, it was MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS who said that he may have been suffering dementia, not his dad. It was a fucking MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL who suggested asking for the cut-job in the first place.Phil Astin and David Black are MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS. MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS are not above saying what is in their best financial interests regardless of the truth. The Sports Legacy Institute's sole reason for existing is to prove that repeated concussions cause dementia. Michael Benoit has a large financial and emotional incentive to prove that Chris Benoit had diminished responsibility. I'm inclined to believe that concussions played a part in his mental condition, but I don't think we should just blindly buy into everything the Sports Legacy Institute says just because it's run by MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS. The comparison to the brain of an Alzheimers sufferer, for example, is a scare tactic designed to mislead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgecrusher Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 For fuck's sake, it was MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS who said that he may have been suffering dementia, not his dad. It was a fucking MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL who suggested asking for the cut-job in the first place.Phil Astin and David Black are MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS. MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS are not above saying what is in their best financial interests regardless of the truth. The Sports Legacy Institute's sole reason for existing is to prove that repeated concussions cause dementia. Michael Benoit has a large financial and emotional incentive to prove that Chris Benoit had diminished responsibility. I'm inclined to believe that concussions played a part in his mental condition, but I don't think we should just blindly buy into everything the Sports Legacy Institute says just because it's run by MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS. The comparison to the brain of an Alzheimers sufferer, for example, is a scare tactic designed to mislead.You missed the point, dumbass.I was referring to the fact that WWE's response was directed purely at Michael Benoit, whose sole input was to repeat what he was told by the people who did the research. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Psygnosis Posted September 8, 2007 Paid Members Share Posted September 8, 2007 Larry King interviews Michael Benoit  There is other stuff regarding Benoit and Brain Damage on the side menu, as well as links to Part 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbins Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 For fuck's sake, it was MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS who said that he may have been suffering dementia, not his dad. It was a fucking MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL who suggested asking for the cut-job in the first place.Phil Astin and David Black are MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS. MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS are not above saying what is in their best financial interests regardless of the truth. The Sports Legacy Institute's sole reason for existing is to prove that repeated concussions cause dementia. Michael Benoit has a large financial and emotional incentive to prove that Chris Benoit had diminished responsibility. I'm inclined to believe that concussions played a part in his mental condition, but I don't think we should just blindly buy into everything the Sports Legacy Institute says just because it's run by MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS. The comparison to the brain of an Alzheimers sufferer, for example, is a scare tactic designed to mislead.You missed the point, dumbass.I was referring to the fact that WWE's response was directed purely at Michael Benoit, whose sole input was to repeat what he was told by the people who did the research.LOL! U SHOOK DOGGY! The first sentence of the response was not aimed at his Dad, calling the medical findings speculative. I made plenty of relevant and interesting talking points aside from mocking your CAPITALIZATION TO EMPHASISE FURY. Feel free to respond to them, preferably using the "in my pants" gimmick from back when you weren't such a miserable prick. kthx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members JNLister Posted September 10, 2007 Paid Members Share Posted September 10, 2007 This went up two days before the brain analysis results came out. And is still up. Nice timing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Seven Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 The Mysterio one still makes me wince. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buba3d Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 The Mysterio one still makes me wince.meh that was nothing, the two chair shots sabu did on rey at one night stand was sickeninghttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=hC0mcCOQmTw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgecrusher Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 This went up two days before the brain analysis results came out. And is still up. Nice timing.Seems to have gone now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L_E_T_H_A_L Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 This went up two days before the brain analysis results came out. And is still up. Nice timing.Seems to have gone now.It was a compilation of brutal chair-shots. WWE are disregarding the evidence of Benoit's brain-damage completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLostScot Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 Imagine how different it would have been if it had been a triple homicide and the suspects were all wrestlers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_the_Lion Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 Imagine how different it would have been if it had been a triple homicide and the suspects were all wrestlers. Eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLostScot Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 Just imagine the court trial. Live on US news each day. Loads of different wrestlers on the stand. Just my idea of excitement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dopper Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 The book is coming soon ...Expected release is Winter 2007 and different sites list is as being 225 - 250 pages long.Scott E. Williams wrote "Hardcore History: The Extremely Unauthorized Story of ECW" and the 'About the Author' bit on Amazon.com says: Scott E. Williams is a criminal-justice reporter and an award-winning wrestling columnist for The Galveston Daily News in Texas. He has been a wrestling fan for more than 20 years and has written two books on professional wrestling, Terry Funk: More Than Just Hardcore (published in 2005 by Sports Publishing L.L.C.) and The Cowboy and the Cross: The Bill Watts Story.Anyone read any of these books, and have thoughts on if he's a decent author? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts