Jump to content

Triller: Holyfield vs Belfort - Sep 11 ?? ?


wandshogun09

Who wins and how?   

6 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Paid Members
Posted
On 9/12/2021 at 11:20 AM, Silky Kisser said:

This Anderson Silva retirement tour is too much fun. The Jake Paul fight would be great but Paul is far too smart to get into the ring with Anderson. Watch him call out Tito. 

Agreed.

Anderson Silva is probably the only MMA fighter who has actually added to his legacy in a positive way coming out of this whole Triller/Jake Paul/Freak show thing. Think its just that hes come in quite unassuming, he's respecful to boxing and he's brought elements of his style into the sport that actually makes it fun to watch, fair fucks to him. When Anderson announced he was going into boxing i think everyone rolled their eyes but its worked out well.

As for Tito, well it couldnt have gone any worse. 

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Paid Members
Posted
2 minutes ago, Egg Shen said:

As for Tito, well it couldnt have gone any better. 

Fixed.

Posted
4 hours ago, theringmaster said:

This whole freak show was a sad night for boxing, at the very least if they got to do these 'exhibitions' put them in head guards.

Aren't head guards even worse though? I know they're effective for preventing cuts etc, but with a head guard all your doing is allowing someone like Holyfield to take even more shots to the head. We don't need head guards, we need 60 year old former fighters not getting licensed.

  • Paid Members
Posted

Was that why the Olympics this year didn't have them? It seemed like they'd decided to ditch amateur rules.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Carbomb said:

Was that why the Olympics this year didn't have them? It seemed like they'd decided to ditch amateur rules.

Yes, that was one reason as to why they changed it the rule for male boxer's in 2016. Head guards were  considered to increase the risk of blows to the head because the padding around the eyes limited the boxer's vision.

  • Paid Members
Posted
18 minutes ago, Gooner said:

Yes, that was one reason as to why they changed it the rule for male boxer's in 2016. Head guards were  considered to increase the risk of blows to the head because the padding around the eyes limited the boxer's vision.

Ah, I see! Thanks for that.

Posted

Could see that coming a mile away. There's only so much mileage in seeing older boxers face each other. Mike Tyson was the exception, because he's Mike Tyson. But we knew other companies would dive in to try to make a quick buck.

  • Paid Members
Posted

Id imagine Triller will be out of the boxing game post-Lopez/Kambosos. They are gonna lose their arse on that too.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...