lokmad Posted January 4, 2006 Posted January 4, 2006 WWE, BUT only from about post-Summerslam. Prior to that they really seemed to be churning out some of the best stuff in ages, which is why I'm also voting for it as promotion of the year.
Dr.Fever Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 WWE - they are missing Brock and quite a few others who they got rid of last year.LAW
wigmonkey Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 (edited) FWA - due to lack of events. Edited January 5, 2006 by wigmonkey
Blackjackjnr. Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 I dont like the idea of the worst awards to be honest!WWE certainly are not the worst promotion and anyone who has said this is pathetic and hypocrytical since half of your voted a WWE match for Match of the YearWorst Promotion - Orig Williams Promotions!
Jamianity Posted January 6, 2006 Posted January 6, 2006 FWA (not the academy) They start storylines but never finish them. They hype matches in Broxbourne and then hold them in Morecambe (or vice versa). They have cancelled numerous shows and had a shitty relaunch in February.
Paid Members Carbomb Posted January 6, 2006 Paid Members Posted January 6, 2006 WWE certainly are not the worst promotion and anyone who has said this is pathetic and hypocrytical since half of your voted a WWE match for Match of the Year The only thing that's pathetic and hypocritical is you thinking you know everybody. I voted WWE because I've only got to read reports to know that they're driving me further and further away from the product - plus, I've not voted anything to do with WWE concerning anything good.WWE isn't the worst promotion IN YOUR OPINION. People don't agree with you - that is their right, as is the right to vote that they think they are the worst promotion this year. Who are you to tell them what they like?
aaron Posted January 6, 2006 Posted January 6, 2006 Are WWE worse than the likes of LAW and OPWO though?
Recommended Posts