Mr. Seven Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 Nope. And it's not the length, it's what you do with it that counts. Apology accepted though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Green Posted March 9, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted March 9, 2011 I've always found Shelton a bit over-rated. That Riho could work circles around him. Â Who? Denial? Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snitsky's back acne Posted March 9, 2011 Author Share Posted March 9, 2011 I've always found Shelton a bit over-rated. That Riho could work circles around him. Â Who? Denial? Interesting. Â No. It's 'we've already ruined one thread and got it locked by bringing that topic up, do we really want to do it again?'. Not very interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members CleetusVanDamme Posted March 9, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted March 9, 2011 This sudden gimmick change is quite frightening. You do realise Shelton isn't female, right?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Green Posted March 9, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted March 9, 2011 I've always found Shelton a bit over-rated. That Riho could work circles around him. Â Who? Denial? Interesting. Â No. It's 'we've already ruined one thread and got it locked by bringing that topic up, do we really want to do it again?'. Not very interesting. And what a great thread we'd be ruining too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snitsky's back acne Posted March 9, 2011 Author Share Posted March 9, 2011 I've always found Shelton a bit over-rated. That Riho could work circles around him. Â Who? Denial? Interesting. Â No. It's 'we've already ruined one thread and got it locked by bringing that topic up, do we really want to do it again?'. Not very interesting. And what a great thread we'd be ruining too. Â Yes, and thanks for your contributions to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiffingtonClyro Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 What is thread about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigBoot Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 Whilst I'm here I'll say I didn't hate the guy and he had a few standout matches (Guerrero and the first Trips match in 2004; Michaels and Angle in 2005; M. Hardy & Taker in 2008) he was just kind of 'there'. A Benjamin return, if it happens, wouldn't mean much because he hasn't been gone long enough. He was there a year ago (last year's MITB). Â What's the point of the long-winded thread title? Why not just go "Shelton Benjamin wrestles dark match for WWE" ? Â Does it matter? Â Yes, otherwise I wouldn't have pointed it out now would I? The worst thread titles are the ones that try to ape 411mania and PWInsider by teasing out what it's actually about with a long-winded title when it's completely unnecessary. And then you even put the guy's name in the sub-heading! Ridiculous. I, like TheBigBoot clicked it from the main page so I didn't see the sub-heading. Had I seen "Shelton Benjamin wrestles WWE dark match" I would have ignored it. Â Absolutely right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snitsky's back acne Posted March 9, 2011 Author Share Posted March 9, 2011 You do realise Shelton isn't female, right?. Â What, with those tits!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snitsky's back acne Posted March 9, 2011 Author Share Posted March 9, 2011 Whilst I'm here I'll say I didn't hate the guy and he had a few standout matches (Guerrero and the first Trips match in 2004; Michaels and Angle in 2005; M. Hardy & Taker in 2008) he was just kind of 'there'. A Benjamin return, if it happens, wouldn't mean much because he hasn't been gone long enough. He was there a year ago (last year's MITB). What's the point of the long-winded thread title? Why not just go "Shelton Benjamin wrestles dark match for WWE" ?  Does it matter?  Yes, otherwise I wouldn't have pointed it out now would I? The worst thread titles are the ones that try to ape 411mania and PWInsider by teasing out what it's actually about with a long-winded title when it's completely unnecessary. And then you even put the guy's name in the sub-heading! Ridiculous. I, like TheBigBoot clicked it from the main page so I didn't see the sub-heading. Had I seen "Shelton Benjamin wrestles WWE dark match" I would have ignored it.  Absolutely right.  See what I like is this 'I wasted my time clicking into a thread I didn't want to yet I'm gonna waste even more time commenting about it' mentality.  It's like people who ring where I work and spend 10 minutes complaining they're ringing a national rate phone line and it's costing them a bomb yet by complaining for 10 minutes about it they are actually the ones costing themselves more money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Seven Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 It's absolutely nothing like that you lunatic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members CleetusVanDamme Posted March 9, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted March 9, 2011 It's clearly not the same thing. People won't be charged money, or have to listen to your heavy panting down the phoneline by coming in here and complaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.