Jump to content

Jimmy_kahoona

Members
  • Posts

    474
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jimmy_kahoona

  1. Devil

     

    5 people are stuck in an elevator, one of them is the Devil

     

    simple premise and simply done movie. I certainly would class this as a B style movie, it doesnt have a big movie feel to it and I dont see repeat viewings for it but it was certainly worth the original viewing. Great if you like Twilight Zone style stories.

  2. i do wish they would put this on the star wars blu-rays

     

     

    with commercials. cant believe i just found this. its about two hours long and possibly one of the worst things ever

     

    How long can you last?

     

    I downloaded this about 5 years ago, in the past 5 years i`ve watched approx 134seconds of this and couldn`t take any more. Its beyond belief.

     

    But then again Vader shouting `Noo!`

     

    my childhood is ruined

  3. Not sure if the second one has been posted in any NBW thread but I couldn't find it......the following is the UK Old Spice advert followed by Mad Man Mansons take on it....Fucking hilarity!

     

     

     

     

    seen this last night

     

    and this is awesome *clap*clap*clapclapclap*

  4. Super 8

     

    <-- click on 'spoiler' to show/hide the spoiler

    BOOM!!! thats pretty much the film in a nutshell.

     

    I grew up with kids adventure film, it was a group of kids (and a dog) who witnessed a bank robbery then hunted down the robber and brought the police. This was just a group of kids (and a dog that ran away) who witness an alien then hunt down the alien and bring the army.

     

    [close spoiler]

    ");document.close();

     

    rubbish!

  5. Anyone seen Frenemy? My local Tesco has it on the shelf next to The Hangover, and the DVD cover is designed as identically to The Hangover as possible. I can only assume that the idea is people in a rush will pick up Frenemy by accident, thinking it's The Hangover.

     

    943628_1.jpg

     

    The-Hangover-DVD.jpg

     

    While in tesco I actually called the wife over and spoke an almost identical line to her!

  6. Insidious

     

    its essentially a film of 2 parts.

     

    the first part is a not too bad thriller/suspense film, similar in style to a 70`s Italian horror. Figures in the background, noises here and there, camera pan following the character through the house. Its not too bad.

     

    The second part is an early 80`s horror film, i`d most compare it to `House`, blackness, smoke, cool creepy monsters and a plot so far gone its not coming back and essentially the complete opposite to the first half.

     

    and that, in my opinion, is where it fails. Its advertised as a paranormal activity style movie from the makers of SAW but essentially its a B Horror which has had excellent advertising campaigns making it look like its a must see horror, but a quick look at the american side and its a PG13! A heart stopping scaring horror thats a PG13? Please!

     

    <-- click on 'spoiler' to show/hide the spoiler

     

     

    The ending sucks. I`ve read a few reviews elsewhere and the phrases `a cool twist ending` `suprise ending` and `scary ending` have been used. Has noone ever seen an 80`s Horror? The `happy ending,,,, oh no its not!` is rather cliche but I suppose the target audience of teenagers havent grown up with these styles of stuff.

     

     

     

    [close spoiler]

    ");document.close();

     

    I`m a fan of both first half and second half styles, seen them done before and find Insidious versions not too bad but I have never seen a film that combines both styles. It doesnt work, the target demographic wont get it and the wife (who was the one who actually wanted to see this) lost every ounce of interest at the cross over point.

     

    This seems to be the new trend, `the last Exorcism` was also a great potential for a horror which nose dived. Make dodgy horror films, make them look attractive and scary, then make a shit load of money before anyone catches on that they`re actually shit.

     

    I would certainly avoid this movie unless you know your getting a B class movie, then grab some popcorn and enjoy a wasted evening.

  7. So that leads me to Battle:LA, I liked the trailer alot, so when the R5 DVD came online I gave it a download, I was going into it with awareness of the negative reviews so it could only be better than I was expecting and it was. Its not a great movie but it was a fun time passer. It really is like Black Hawk Down vs Aliens (not the 1986 movie), that's the best comparison I can make on what to expect. Think too many scenes slowed the pacing and it probably might have been better served by being 10 - 15 mins shorter. Also it really is Aaron Eckhart's movie, he's the only character that they really put any effort into developing, everyone else are just virtually faceless soldiers, only ones that stand apart are Michele Rodriguez cause she's a woman and Jim Parrack, only if you recognise him as Hoyt from True Blood however, neither are given anything to stand out from the pack.

    The camera work also was nowhere near as shaky as I was expecting, its shot by Handcam but its not jerky and jarring at all, I expected it to be as jarring as Cloverfield by somethings I read.

    I think they have done a good job making each side feel like proper real life army soldiers even though one side are CGI creations.

    Really a film for people that like soldiers shooting at each other, you won't get any great acting performances, dialogue or indeed anything you won't have seen before. Its been a box office hit so I wouldn't be shocked if a sequel ever popped up. Its just a fun movie if its the sort of thing you enjoy, I'd give it a 6 out of 10.

    Its been a box office hit so I wouldn't be shocked if a sequel ever popped up.

     

    Not often someone captures the same thoughts as myself but I got to agree with this.

     

    I felt the film was a bit like spinning around on the spot with your eyes open, its fun to begin with but you realise theres no real substance and its giving you a headache!

  8. SkyLine

     

    Theres been a few older reviews when this film hit the big screen so i wont bore you with any details.

     

    Visually its stunning. The creatures are awsome (even if they are rip off of several other films) and if this film got a decient script and set pieces it would have been great but its all done for show, no substance, all fur coat and no knickers (as they say round these parts)

     

    Worth a watch on a big screen but dont hold out for anything other than eye candy.

     

    Oh and that ending. In my opinion, it was actually quite good. Different but good (if it had ended about 4 minutes earlier it may have been better)

  9. Fucking aye. I remember getting all excited when I finally got the opportunity to watch an uncut version of Driller Killer.

     

    I remember saying out loud numerous times, "They actually banned this shit?"

     

    and now this Video Nasty, that will corrupt, deprave and mentally disturb the nation, is available in Poundland!

     

    Accessable to anyone with loose change in their pocket!

  10. No idea what makes the set "special" sorry and I only picked it up as an impulse buy today because its an era that has always interested me and I can just about remember the "under the counter films" shenanigans of the 80's.

     

    Play.com have both special and non-special, only difference I see is a set of Post cards!

     

    Anyway, I`ll pick this up as i`ve always had a fasination with the nasties. i lived this stuff when I was younger, hunting, searching, trading and even going into `secret back rooms` of Video stores to buy banned tapes!

     

    You kids have no idea how easy you have it, what with the internet and those torrents! Imagine waiting 6 years to see a film only to discover its a 4th generation copy and shit! Ah, memories!

  11.  

    i like the look of that! i half expected it to be a comedy, but that's due to the ridicuous title, looks good.

     

    HOW?

     

    Initially I thought `dodgy B movie` but the names in this and the names associated with this is beyond belief!

     

    There must be more to this project than it looks.

     

    *edit

     

    Nope, just seems its a standard graphic novel adaptation, but again HOW? Ford, Craig, Howard, Spielberg, Favreau, why would they grab what looks like a standard graphic novel?

     

    Doesn`t look all that great or exciting

  12. Guys and Dolls

     

    Marlon Brando and Frank Sinatra star in the movie adaptation of the stage musical. Made in 1955.

     

    Heres the quick version of the movie:

     

    Guy bets guy he cant get the salvation army woman!

     

    essentially thats it.

     

    Theres a few running plots about a gambling den and another about a marriage but that just seems to be filler around the main plot.

     

    I didnt like it! Whoever thought Marlon Brando could sing needs shot (but hes a very good dancer). The musical numbers are truely awful, most unforgettable, and even the famous `Luck be a lady` song didnt seem to fit in properly. The film felt really, really cheap.

     

    and yet it was nominated for 4 Academy Awards! (must have been a slow year or something!)

     

    I only watched it because my daughter is doing it for her school show next year and I wish I hadn`t bothered. But at least I know what to expect, 8 months of listening to truely bad musical numbers!

  13. DJ Kris, i've seen the Michael Caine movie, i remember sticking the DVD on at like 1am expecting to nod off half hour in, 4am i was still there hooked to the TV, great little movie.

     

    Any other Jack The Ripper movies about?

     

     

    That Caine version I have always loved, spooky I think and well acted, and something you can stick on on a sunday afternoon and get stuck into to.

    This was one of those free dvds you got in the paper during the `Collect all 5 Michael Caine films week` and still sells well on ebay!

  14. Trick R Treat

     

    Was going to go see Saw 3D but because of the weather decided to stay in the house but still having a lust for some horror I cracked this out. Its an anthology movie, 4 short stories linked together my a mysterious 5th story. Similar in style to Creepshow of the ever excellent Amicus style movies.

     

    Its Halloween night and theres some killings going on, monsters, vampires, werewolfs, mummies, psychos and strange neibours. From the Urban Myths of a school bus taking a plumet down a quarry, to a vampire killing his victims in plain sight and noone caring, to the people who think halloween is just a load of tosh, theres plenty of cliches to get by on.

     

    I grew up on these sort of films, slight twists in the tails of each and enough nods to the classics as you can get, so i really enjoyed it. The wife on the other hand had a different view, boring, predictable and plain! She left about half way through and decided that sleep was better entertainment.

     

    So If you like these sort of `tales from the crypt` movies then fire away, enough to make you smile, but if your into your harder horror then there probably wont be enough to keep you here after the opening story!

×
×
  • Create New...