Jump to content

Lenin

Paid Members
  • Posts

    862
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lenin

  1. My dad who's barely ever mentioned anything sexual to me in my entire life just told me he didn't see the point in anal sex because it was no different to shagging a bloke. I said surely the same could be said about blowjobs but he just didn't understand my point at all no matter how much I explained it to him.

    I can't believe this lost hasn't been addressed yet. Quite honestly laughed in the middle if the office when I read it.

     

    Also,no lead up...just out with I don't see the point in jobby jabbing?

  2. Another one I read suggests it was Jacen that got stabbed. He was testing the waif after telling her not to make her suffer, yet she butchered her insides rather than a straight throat slit.

     

    Head hurts reading about it, so many variables.

     

    I don't mind her character, just feel she's involved in one too many odd story lines.

  3. The Undertaker looked like an absolute fucking idiot last night. Probably the least intimidating he's ever looked once he got all his gear off. There needs to be some sort of company wide intervention on crap barnets because it's one thing to have hold of newer talent like Ambrose and Neville who still have time to do the righht thing, and for retired headcases like Ric Flair but it's another for The Undertaker to take off his murdering hat and reveal what looks like the collapsing remains of a burnt out thatched cottage on top of his melon. That gear always had him on a very thin tightrope, but he just looks fucking stupid now. Muffin top over his leather jocks, only tanning his face for some weird reason, birds next syrup. Mental.

    "company wide intervention on crap barnets" is a great way of putting it

  4. If the Citrus Bowl is stuck in the middle of a shit hole in Orlando then how did they manage to lure Kim Kardashian there for Mania 24 ? But then again that Kardashian's shite wasn't really as big back in 2008. That's probably why she took the booking.

    It's in one of the poorest areas of the city for sure. We went to see the stadium two years ago and I can honestly say I've never felt so at risk.

     

    Not a place to be after dark.

  5.  

     

    I think some people are over thinking the whole "why would Taker do this"? thing.

    You ask "why?" And all I can think is "why not?". Frankly the character dosent care for such trivial family disputes. He's not pro Vince, but he isn't anti Shane either.

    The Taker dosent care if his opponent is Lesner, Barakus, Lita, Mark Henry, Savio Vega or Shane McMahon. He's been put into a match and he's going to go wrestle it. He's too proud to go and throw a match for a family squabble that dosent concern him.

     

    On the other hand, Undertaker has been referred to as the "conscience of the WWE" on numerous occasions and it strikes me as bizarre that somebody described as such would be fighting on behalf of super-heel Vince McMahon.

    Takers has a long history as Vince's henchman. He's the guy that stayed loyal when everyone was jumping ship, he obeyed the higher power and fought for WWE against the Invaders. For 20+ years he's been by Vince's side to protect the WWE now when it's under threat again he steps up to protect it.

     

    That's my take on it but it's not really been mentioned. Perhaps they should get that max dude to do one of his videos

    Might end up with Steph begging Vince not to or something. I got the whole "you don't know what you're asking" vibe but can see some Steph/Shane collusion to get the company off Vince.

     

    That raises more questions though so yeah, no further forward in terms of storyline.

  6. Yeah I saw you that on Twitter. Obviously won't be him if he's filming...thought the film was done before mania and he would be doing promotional stuff. Point is I'd be very surprised if Shane vs Taker goes ahead, even with shenanigans.

  7. The massiver swerve with Shane was tremendous but I can't see a 50 year old Shane taking 'the bump' off the cage or anything which is really all I'd want to see. I suspect that Cena or Batista will be the ones to step in on Shane's behalf.

     

    HHH absolutely killed Reigns in that segment. 10 years ago I'd have been upset by it but HHH is, in 2016, the best they have. Cena wouldn't have got those reactions. HHH knows exactly what he's doing and, for the first time ever, I can see HHH actually winning a title match at 'Mania.

  8. Agree with Porky and Carbomb here, watching that match at the time I felt like I was looking at a bright future for WWE. Collectively, those six guys were fucking stars and the fans were so hot for both teams and the match itself. Two years on, not one of those guys is as over as they were during that period. Of course you could argue that some of them have 'gone on to better things' because they have held belts or whatever, but fan reaction tells the real story.

    Agree with the above...holding belts doesn't mean being over. And with the exception of Lesnar/Cena/Reigns triple threat none of the participants have actually had a better match since.

     

    The same is said every few years though, just those six raised the bar from what we'd seen prior with the likes of Ziggler, Benjamin, Kofi etc.

  9.  

     

    Bubba Ray is brilliant as a heel. Why not have him burst a few folk and take on Brock? Bit late for Mania but it's a match I'd like to see.

    In my "ideal" Mania card based on who's going to be available, the Fast Lane card etc, I have Buh Buh/Bully with Styles. A.J. is the bollocks but I'd put him in with a strong heel. Even a six week or so build based on a Dudleys split and turn would do for now.

    That I could definitely live with. Good shout.

     

    I know the Brock/Bubba thing was done briefly 12 years ago but both are much better in how they carry themselves and go about their business in the ring.

     

    Heel Bubba in TNA was actually pretty damn good. Too late for Brock but a short build with AJ could be quality.

  10. That's true, he'd be the perfect person for the Authority golden boy role! It's a shame he was way too far gone by the time they started doing that. He's much more dynamic on the microphone than Rollins, and he'd play that character in the ring miles better than Seth did.

     

    Really, Sheamus should be better in that spot than he actually was as well, but he was only ever a fall guy.

    I agree that Sheamus should be a million times better but he got the belt before he was ready and booked into oblivion with his recent run.

  11. He could play the Seth Rollins company guy to a tee. Better than Sheamus. And would have genuine heat.

     

    He's punched well above his weight for some time but as much as an afterthought he was, the outcry at the time was hilarious and he was perfect.

     

    Underrated in the grand scheme of things

×
×
  • Create New...