AshC Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 Is it in a better or worse position than WCW in 2000? There's a lot of angles to examine this from, and I'm interested to see what the consensus is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators PowerButchi Posted May 1, 2013 Moderators Share Posted May 1, 2013 Ratings wise, far worse. WCW was still doing ok ratings really in 2000 and was selling far more PPVs. Financially though I imagine TNA are streets ahead. Booking wise they are too. From Kevin Sullivan's lame duck 3 months which was the most boring product ever to the general "WHAT?" of Russo, TNA win there. Â I dunno, it's probably about 50/50 really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.