Dynamite Duane

Introduction To The British Constitution Group

This is the growing group whose meetings I go along to. Groups of people around the country coming together who basically have decided they've had enough of how useless our parliamentarians are, by not doing what's best for the nation and it's people.

Rogers Hayes is the same guy who at the Birkenhead Court in March demanded the judge who was not on his oath be arrested for acting unlawfully. I heard him talk in Bournemouth on Thursday about alternative governance, the lawful bank and setting as separate currency, as well as having proper common law courts.

Anyway check it out for yourselves.

The way the Twin Towers go down is a lot different to WTC7, I point out WTC7 because it stands out so much as appearing to be a controlled demolition and experts have recognised this as I have quoted. Regards the Twin Towers they explode rather than implode. I guess you're implying the official story of the pancake "theory" is then correct. The problem here is the buildings were built in the 60s to the withstand the impact of a Boeing airliner colliding into them, 9/11 is the first case of a building being destroyed by a plane hitting it with the steel girders melting instead part of the structure still standing. If I recall correctly Keelan's excellent video covers this. However I've watched so many 9/11 investigative films the past couple of weeks revising on it all, that could be from another one. Also fires were put and people told it was safe, then there were explosions according to witnesses.

This video is well worth checking out if you watched the BBC 3 Conspiracy Road Trip programme or for that matter anyone interested in the 9/11 topic. It's an excellent rebuttal and only about 40mins long. Keelan makes some valid points and quotes some expert engineers.

 

Propaganda Defined: BBC Conspiracy Road Trip Review

 

By the way Charlie Veitch who featured in the Road Trip programme is known for "doing a Duane", as it's now known as around here Myself and others posed questions at him on Facebook regarding the anomolies of 9/11 and he never replied. Odd as well how he left Facebook in March when he decided he needed to go all low-key following March 26 demonstrations in London, then a month or 2 later he reappeared on there.

 

You've got no comment or input at all on the last 3 or 4 pages of this thread? Where people have debated and presented proof that answers pretty much all the main contentions of 9/11 theorists? And you're going to instead post a 40 fucking minute documentary made by a guy who famously lost his shit all over this forum? You really suck, Duane. At least Horrorshow had the balls to have some back and forth before pulling the disappearing act.

 

EDIT: oh, wow. The first few pages of that Keelan thread are brilliant. He's a complete lunatic. Butch posted a cartoon a couple of pages in from Viz that perfectly sums up the madness of conspiracy theory.

When have popped by I noticed Horrorshow was doing a good job on his own, I wouldn't want to steal someone else's thunder

Anyhow feel free to discuss the video by Keelan, or is just going to get ignored and the poor the fellow insulted instead?

EDIT:

Guess I've mainly quoted other people and videos, rather that saying what makes me question the official story.

To me the destruction of Building 7 really makes me question it, it wasn't hit by an airliner and we see it go down like pancake, exactly like a controlled demolition. A demolition expert was shown footage and said he can a controlled demolition before being told it was one of the WTC buildings.

The passport of the alleged hijacker conveniently found despite nearly everything else literally turned to dust.

Thirdly there is the question of the war games occurring at the same time as the hijackings.

If anyone replies to this and thinks I'm ignoring their comments when there is no reply, feel free to give me a nudge and PM me and I'll then happily reply in the thread. However I'll tend to ignore insults!

Cheers.

Theres more than enough evidence without the video... but Popular Mechanics say they have it. Go buy the enchanced ebook and see.

Oh yeah, Popular Mechanics lol they get quoted quite a bit by the BBC.

Keelan makes some valid points and quotes some expert engineers.

Is that video made by ex-UKFFer Keelan who splashed his mental illness all over this thread? http://ukff.com/index.php?showtopic=118572

Same person. I don't think he has a mental though

Here you go Duane

 

August 4, 2011 12:00 AM BUY THE BOOK

Debunking 9/11 Myths is available as a paperback, ebook, and enhanced ebook. The latter contains ten videos and audio clips, carefully selected to support the evidence presented, including the security camera footage of Flight 22 crashing into the Pentagon.

 

 

 

http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Debunking...e/9781588169433

Thanks I'll check that out over the weekend.

EDIT:

I see it's a book etc to buy. Sorry but I'm not buying that mate, surely this supposed video evidence should be freely available in the public domain. If there's a youtube video please post it? Cheers.

Oh, and the PM ebook has videos of flight 73 hitting the pentagon.

Have I missed something? I must see this! I've yet to see conclusive video evidence of the airliner hitting the Pentagon.

This video is well worth checking out if you watched the BBC 3 Conspiracy Road Trip programme or for that matter anyone interested in the 9/11 topic. It's an excellent rebuttal and only about 40mins long. Keelan makes some valid points and quotes some expert engineers.

Propaganda Defined: BBC Conspiracy Road Trip Review

By the way Charlie Veitch who featured in the Road Trip programme is known for "doing a Duane", as it's now known as around here Myself and others posed questions at him on Facebook regarding the anomolies of 9/11 and he never replied. Odd as well how he left Facebook in March when he decided he needed to go all low-key following March 26 demonstrations in London, then a month or 2 later he reappeared on there.

Woohoo Ghosthunting with TOWIE!!!

 

Cue screaming, overreactions & Yvette Fielding chucking stones around!

I've recorded that to watch, good for a chuckle

Been enjoying Seven Dwarfs on Channel 4, following the little people playing the 7 Dwarfs in the panto in Woking, my old manor. It's got some funny bits, emotional scenes and glimpses of my old town And it's all Christmassy and calming to watch lol

Caught a classic IT Crowd episode last night, where Moss lies that Jen has died. He then has to lie further to cover it up, the bloke she went a date with is "haunted" by her! It's pant-wettingly funny

I have Gypsy's in my family not new age ones either my great grandparents were ones who settles down but the rest of the family didn't and TBH they are probably the only members of my family (except my mum and brothers) who I like.

 

However if these travelers broke the law they broke the law the law is above nobody.

Agreed! There's good and bad in all types of people, I've worked with Gypsies when I worked for Guildford Borough Council. I recall working with one when a team of us had to clear up after some Irish Tinkers who pitched on common land, and it's true they don't shit in their caravans! The gypsy bloke I worked with wasn't keen on them, not that he was an angel himself, he was the go to man for your contraband!

I wasn't going to get into any discussion since I'm not feeling very well today, just browse to see what the opinions were on this Gypsy topic but felt compelled to post since I find myself agreeing with my nemesis Loki! An occasion to rejoice I feel it's cheered me up

Was checking out the story on the news and see 34 of the of the pitches for the caravans are legal, the additional 51 are illegal, with 400 people crammed in there. Why do they want live like that, especially when offered council housing? I don't get it personally.

Have you done your independent research back up that claim?

"I can answer that - I spent about 2 or 3 weeks looking at the various theories and "evidence" presented by the conspiracy movement, as well as reading all the official documents and also independent research not picked up by the conspiracy theorists.

 

The conclusion I came to was that whilst the US government might have had a number of indicators that a terrorist attack was likely, if not indeed imminent, there was absolutely not one shred of verifiable, consistent evidence to suggest that any department of the US government had any hand in the planning or execution of the attack.

 

Is that good enough for you?

 

 

 

I know nothing about this guy, but even I can immediately see that there's another possibility you've conveniently not listed there - the possibility that as a result of the evidence and testimony he found on that trip, he realised he was wrong.

 

In fact, isn't that by far the most likely possibility, for more likely than your other ones, Duane?

 

Whilst we're here, are you going to comment on the Alex Jones video posted on page 71 Duane?

 

Any chance you'll actually debate these two things, or shall we just book you in for another visit to the thread next month?

Why would I want to bother discussing anything with you Loki when you use such an arrogant tone? There's some people on here I think come across as a bit thick tbh but you sound clever and articulate but spoil yourself with an arrogant attitude quite honestly. Just because I miss your comment or not on here when you are you throw a strop I don't come on here as often, whoopee dooo!!!

Regards Charlie changing his mind, it shows they picked someone who wasn't very well clued up and couldn't have a decent debate with them. Would have been totally different if they'd picked Richard Gage for example from Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth.

No, I've got no comment on the Alex Jones vid, I've not seen it, sorry not interested. Move on!

Weapons of mass deception - UKIP Leader Nigel Farage conference speech.

One of the few politicians who tells it like is!

Isn't that what Duane has been saying? I know he used some far-out terms such as illuminati and the like, but when you get right down to the brass tacks of it all isn't he just saying that powerful people are in cahoots with one another to maintain their grip on power at the expense of the plebs?

You're right David, it's as simple as that. And I prefer the term Elite Globalists

Regards to 9/11 and other conspiracies I believe it's more important to focus on the WHY they did it rather than how. We can easily go round and around circles and never know the absolute truth. Even some of those involved won't know the bigger picture since these operations are so compartmentalised.

Anyone else on here watch BBC 3's Conspiracy Road Trip on Thursday? It's an interesting one for those in the truth movement since it features the well known and charismatic Charlie Veitch (Love Police). Someone who until recently was popular with many truthseekers, he flip-flopped and changed his mind on 9/11 being an inside job in a very short space of time following this trip to the States with the BBC.

Part 1 of the programme.

Since Charlie changing his opinion to quick and easily as you can imagine there has been all sorts of speculation as to whether CV was genuine to begin with or controlled opposition, if Neuro Linguistic programming was used or if he's just someone after his 15minutes of fame. CV has previously appeared on TV alongside Anarchists at the March 26 demo, interviewed by ITV when he declared he would protest the Royal Wedding, then was subsequently arrested before leaving his home in Cambridge. He's also appeared on Russia Today and Press TV. Plus his girlfriend Silkie appeared on a reality show.

For anyone interested Edge Media are airing a 3 hour debate tomorrow from 6-9pm, which I'm sure will mention the BBC 3 debunking programme.

http://www.emtvonline.co.uk/main/viewpage.php?page_id=8

EDIT:

Checking through the schedule it appears the channel is devoting most of the day to the topic of 9/11 and False Flag Terrorism.

The last paragraph there is the crucial one.

The way I see it is we have 2 contradictory statements. One saying she was most likely abused and one saying there is lack of evidence to convict anyone. Worthy of note no one has stood on trial here regards the alleged abuse, yet Robert Green is continued to be summons to court. No one has been brought to justice on any of this, including those who broke into Anne and Hollie's home.

If those accused of child abuse are not guilty then they have nothing to fear and should want to clear their names and should take Robert Green and Anne Greig to court to for slander.

Edge Media interviewed Robert Green last Thursday, with a full update. The hour long programme is on youtube, here's the playlist:

Robert Green interview - Edge Media 25/8/11

Erm, why exactly?

He can present some good information, but I'm not into his style to be honest. He gets a little too carried away!

Also I'd prefer to listen to the info he's got on US stories and listen to someone based in the UK when it comes to what's happening over here generally speaking.

Apols if I sounded a bit off, I might have a listen at some point, cheers for sharing.

Hey Duane did you manage to catch Alex Jones meltdown over the riots?

 

If not you really should it's golden.

 

No I didn't. Thanks all the same but I probably won't waste my time listening to it.

And I guess that's the best disincentive of all - seeing how many looters have been apprehended and had the book thrown at them, will discourage similar behaviour in the future. A friend of mine who's a criminal barrister tells me that a significantly high percentage of those charged with the worse crimes already had a criminal record as well.

These people had nothing to lose by the sounds of it, got little and have little prospects. Lots of people get locked up yet there is a problem with rehabilitation it would seem, so the problem isn't solved. The root cause of why these people offend needs to be addressed, coupled with rehabilitation of offenders.

I recommend this insightful radio interview with campaigner and retired Naval Commander Brian Gerrish, delving into the story of the recent riots and what's happening to the police force.

Been watching Inbetweeners 'countdown' programme and the Comic Relief one.

Saw a lot of the Urban/Hip Hop season on Channel 4.

Oh yeah that programme about the "little guys" on 4, about Seven Dwarfs in Snowwhite, Woking - my old manor I've always dwarfs since seeing Time Bandits as a kid lol

Celebrity Big Brother starts tomorrow....

Torchwood: Miracle Day is pretty awesome at the minute, though there is a lingering air of 'British Tele' over it that stops me from taking it to the next level.

Heard about it, is this the storyline where no one dies in the future?

"'A truly outstanding book ... essential reading for all who retain the power of critical thought' - Ian R Crane, founder of The Alternative View"

 

So I take it this is a guy who gently but firmly debunks all these conspiracy theories, right?

Nah!!! Haha!!! why'd I be interested in that? I'm a conspiracy nut after all

I don't know if they printed it but Ian R Crane got some coverage with the Sun online:

World’s powers will fake alien invasion at the Olympics closing ceremony to keep us living in fear

— Ian Crane at Exopolitics Expo

Link also includes input from Ian's nemesis Nick Pope, who used to work for the military. An interesting character who promotes UFOs then debunks them, a little confusing his position on UFOs from what I've seen of his interviews but it's clear he doesn't question 9/11 and false flag terrorism.

I really want to get in on the conspiracy theory business.

Start a national Sunday newspaper then Neil, I hear the last ever edition of the News of the World following the Hackgate conspiracy was a complete sell-out! Much better than 30 people in village hall buying 10 copies of your book