Jump to content

Kiffy

Members
  • Posts

    795
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kiffy

  1. I've never really understood why these extreme Muslims live in the UK if they hate it so much.

    Because they were born here?

     

    No ones forcing them to stay

     

    No-one's forcing the edl, the left wing, the bnp, or anyone else who lives here to live here. But if you're born somewhere that's your home, it's where you live, and you'll want it run the way you think it should be run.

    Not to say they're not a bunch of mentalists, but if you're born here, you'll live here for the most part. Not hard to understand.

  2. I honestly couldn't give a fuck about seeing the Black Album live. An updated S&M, however, is something I could get behind.

     

    But only if they do Fade To Black this time.

     

    With you on that, sandman bores me now, and other than a couple of tunes (sad but true and unforgiven) nothing on the black album particularly excites me. Seeing em do MOP right through again, that'd excite me, lightnig and justice as well, s and m even. Just not the black album!

    (And yeah, needs more fade to black).

  3. I think its going to a reunion tour rather a new album. There was talk of a new album when they first reunited in the late 90's, which, bar a new track on the 'Reunion' live album, never materialised

     

    A journalist printed a story that it'd be a new album, and iommi slated him for repeated comments made in private. Brian may's also said that it'll be a new album, and he's apparantly quite tight with iommi. Tour's pretty much guaranteed, new album looks quite likely as well.

  4. Plus buying house's isn't quite that simple, deposits are lots of cash, on top of which you need good credit to get a mortage or buy somewhere. And living on the road doesn't give you great credit, cos by their records yoo don't exist.

    And being given a bedsit on the council somewhere (if they'll house you at all, which as a traveller they won't be bending over themselves to do) really isn't the same.

  5. And that's fine old boy, a valid and reasonable opinion.

    Nonetheless, david asked him about the edl, he spoke about them, dead mike asked something else, mickey made up some lies about them being non-violent, and I pointed out those were lies. That's not me goading big mickey into talking about the EDL (which wouldn't be allowed) that's mickey talking about the EDL already (which isn't allowed) and me noticing it.

    Now I figured that you'd have the mental capacity to see that, and therefore it followed that if you were saying it was something else, it'd be down to your dislike of me for being shit and deliberately contrary (rather than accidently contrary, which is always embarassing). But I am happy to admit I may have entirely misjudged that, and you may just be a bit slow.

  6. Hee, bless you gladstone. Dead mike posted this

     

    It seems you have a very 'pick & mix' attitute to the EDL. As soon as anyone points out any instances of violence, thuggery or in this case, proposed violence you seem to admonish it & distance yourself. Surely as a 'member' of a group you're either in or out? Daz suggested several think tanks & alternatives to the EDL yet you seemingly ignored him. It's the equivalent of being a member of the boy scouts & saying 'I don
  7. Not quite gladstone, he's not allowed to discuss it, others aren't allowed to goad him into discussing it, the rest of the board wasn't banned from mentioning it.

    Whether or not he used the title, he was discussing it, I just responded. You could probably get him and david suspended if you desperately wanted to though.

  8. I've seen so many newpsaper reports of edl members being nicked it's pretty pointless to just post a few here.

    But obviously what you've just said is simply a ridiculous lie, the groups involved in loads of violence, and has more than enough prison sentences, arrest, and you tube evidence to show this.

    If you needed any more proof you could just look at the comments of EDL members on your facebook wall.

    Oh and your girlfriend beating police woman assaulting leader is about to get sentenced due to breaking his parol conditions, conditions he received for being involved in violent conduct.

    Come on mickey, you're not that thick.

  9. Plus things like the gang warfare kicking off in san andreas, different bits of the city in different colours kicking off with each other and different alliances. That's the type of stuff I wanted to see continued or added to in gta4.

  10. See this is what I mean re gta4 being less fun, sickboy wants to be a black 90's LA gangsta (as do I, to be fair, growing up on ice cube and ice t and all that good shit will do that) some want to be tony montana (me too) some want to be a high level mafioso (also me too).

    No-one ever said, "How cool was that eastern european gangsta who'se probably been involved in war crimes," so no-one's evere wanted to be him.

    Which was probably my main issue with GTAIV.

  11. In terms of graphics undoubtedly so. And if you were one of the people who preferred the way the new cars handled, then in terms of that as well.

    But what else did they improve on?

  12. Great stuff, can't wait for this. I think Kiffy summed it up best with:

    Cos 4 wasn't really a massive step up from 3, certainly not in the same league as the difference between 2 and 3.

    I think graphically it was a massive, massive step (again as expected). You play GTA4, then go back to play San Andreas straight after. I struggled.

     

    Must admit haven't played andreas in ages, but the only real update seemed to be the graphics. Which you would expect. Game play wise it didn't seem better, in fact if anything it almost went backwards. Less to do, less size, I was expecting something mindblowing. And got something that looked alot better.

    Though as matey probably rightly said, it might be silly to expect a similar leap as there was between 2-3.

  13. True but they were the add on's, which I think were reactions to how gritty the actual GTA4 was.

     

    I can see the reasoning behind moving from 4 to 5 though. Cos 4 wasn't really a massive step up from 3, certainly not in the same league as the difference between 2 and 3.

    So you'd hope with the huge amount of extra power the ps3 has compared to the ps2 (and the 360, obviously) this could be the ground breaking next level amazingness we'd all like.

  14. They need some humour back, or at least something cool. All the the games pre gta4 had a cool as fuck lead character clearly based on massive gangsta films people knew and loved.

    GTA4 had an eastern european who'd probably commited war atrocities.

    As a result it got a little too gritty, and lost alot of it's fun. Hope they change that.

×
×
  • Create New...