big mickey

No.

If there is a chance to take the target alive with little resistance you take them.

Even if it involves completely disregarding international law and mounting a military operation in Pakistan without their authority.

Absolutely!

When you see a man whos been wanted for 10 years in your sights you shoot to kill

No.

If there is a chance to take the target alive with little resistance you take them.

How much do any of us really know?

A firsthand experience in Afghanistan would blow blow you away matey.

That people like Bin Laden, the Taliban & others who would love to see westerners wiped off the face of the earth are the bad guys?

 

I guess so, yes.

What about us though? Aren't we at fault for invading countries like Afghanistan and Iraq?

Not really, as it wasn't a war with the Afghan Iraqi people, it was more an attempted liberation for them (which was a bit of an oversight on our part) it was mainly to drive the terroristic & actually quite evil regimes out of power.

Urgh, no offence mate, but you really have no idea do you?

Are you buying into it then?

That people like Bin Laden, the Taliban & others who would love to see westerners wiped off the face of the earth are the bad guys?

I guess so, yes.

Killing Bin Laden instead of taking him alive when they had the opportunity to do so was a huge mistake.

He was dar more valuable alive than dead.

Ah, I see. So, you buy into the whole scenario of us being the good guys, fighting for the freedom of our people, whilst the nasty foreigners are the bad guys?

Urgh, no offence mate, but you really have no idea do you?

Who were "the bad men" that we were wanting to "get" in Afghanistan, Mickey?

That guy, what's his name? Bin Liner?

Noticed that walking wankstain Assange was in London rallying "the troops" today, wonder if it violated his bail conditions?

Only decent thing in Afghanistan to take was the opium if anything.

If you think oil doesn't play a part you're slower than even I normally give you credit for.

Oil had very little to do with it. Afghanistan especially.

It was about getting bad men.

I think I've said it before but the wars in the middle east were mainly score setters and knee jerk reactions.

There is no big conspiracy or secret agendas behind them.

We're not taking on Iran anytime soon, unless they actually go off on Israel or something.

Not really that fussed by his views and that, it's mainly him, can't stand the cunt at all

Oh goody Ken Livingstone is on Question Time

 

aaaaaaaand point remote - OFF!

 

There, happiness

 

You do realise this isn't twitter, right? You've come into a politics thread to make the point that you're avoiding politics.

And you've come into a politics thread to have a pop at me.

The point was my weekly enjoyment of QT was spoilt due to Kenny Boy.

See?

Oh goody Ken Livingstone is on Question Time

aaaaaaaand point remote - OFF!

There, happiness

One day I'll be successful and have the clout to reboot the Carry Ons.

After Carry On Columbus I don't think we should risk it.

Last year we had both Four Lions and The Infidel. Both British comedies.

Infidel was meh, Four Lions was awesome, but not the most uplifting comedy ever

Yeah seems like there are too many urban britflicks out there. Even a funny one like anuvahood had a darkish edge to it.

It's sad cos we rule at comedy & such

Started Hobo With A Shotgun

 

I expect gore, messiness and laughs!

Haha this was great!

Song from the Racoons at the end! Boss.

Started Hobo With A Shotgun

I expect gore, messiness and laughs!

Pffft, justice system is a joke I tells ya!

Finished Deadwood Season 1

Amazing show, Al Swearengen is a great character, one minute he's a twat, next he's funny as fuck, then shows his more compassionate side now and then.

Just watched [Rec], picked it up cheap from ASDA a couple of months ago as it was only

Re: Lister must be suspended talk, mickey the bell-end was actually using the Daily Mail as a source.

 

OVERRULED

 

Really Mickey, if you're going to come onto this board, then the very least you could do is respect the laws of the board, without deciding you have better laws. That simply will not stand.

So you either have rules or you don't, making them up, overruling them without good reason or simply ignoring them invalidates any rules that you set up.

It therefore breeds anarchy and distrust for the powers that be, a bit like the point that are being made in this thread.

People should be treated fairly, correct?

Oh and by the by one of the messages I got from neil spcificly contained "Like I said, if anyone tries to goad you, then they will be suspended"

So it seems I don't have to respond at all. So I assume a suspension is forthcoming to the guilty party?