Jump to content

tom

Paid Members
  • Posts

    3,254
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tom

  1. I normally only play SD vs. RAW and PES4 (PC version), but I've been playing Lego Star Wars for the last week or two; its a very cool game. I've completed Episode's 1, 2 and 3; but I havent un-locked the fourth door which I believe is a level based on "Episode 4"; any ideas what I need to do to unlock that level?

  2. The tease of Batista turning face on HHH on the RAW when Benoit was in charge.Orton/Foley FeudJBL/Eddie FeudEdge's slow heel turnThe Kidman angle (i.e. all that SSP business with Chavo/London etc.)Kane and Lita's wedding (comedy gold!!)EugeneEddie/Brock feudTakers returnBenoit/HBK/HHH FeudEddie/Chavo Feud

  3. It's a convo between RF and a 14 year old boy who is a homosexual. They chat, exchange photos or something which leads to the 14 year old kid jacking off to one of RF's photos. It's messed up.

    If it was all consenting then surely its not peadophilic, if he was encouraging him and harrasing him then it would be peadophilic.

     

    Its hard to comment without seeing the actual site though

  4. Everything in the two articles is sheer and solid FACT, apart from the opinion on the Backlash match, so there are bound to be similarities. Take for example, if they were two essays on what led to WW1 then there would be loads of similarities. Would a teacher throw a big fit and accuse everyone in the class of ripping each other's work or ripping from a history textbook; no. As for the opinion, are we not allowed to have the same opinion as a magazine? I was somewhat disappointed with Eddie v RVD, not that I had too much knowledge of the excellence of Eddie Guerrero at that time. Its not as if Nigel Law wrote out the entire article word for word and posted it on here. He just wrote an article, which dealt with the same facts as the original article, but he could hardly make a few things up could he. Like throw in something like, "Eddie was obsessed with pigeons during this hard time, and was even arrested for a sexual act on a pigeon". Even IF this was copied from a magazine article it would have been a simple mistake. Are people really suggesting all his RAW and SmackDown reviews and his PPV reviews, which might I add were of a great standard in my opinion, were stolen and/or copied? I think notAs for the ass licking comment about myself, let me get this right, I'm an ass licker because I, like many others, said Nigel's reviews were great? I haven't been proven wrong whatsoever, because this wasn't stolen from a previous article, and I believe Nigel when he says that, and other articles that I've seen and praised haven't been copied either.As for Nigel's involvement with X-Wrestling, I am very skeptical (sp?) of X-Wrestling but that doesnt change my views on Nigel. Its a job for Nigel and I've got no problem with that whatsoever. I hope that X-Wrestling is a success, especially for Nigel's sake.It would be a real shame if Nigel Law now stopped posting on UKFF, as IMO he is an enjoyable part of the UKFF.

×
×
  • Create New...