Jump to content

PBWFan

Members
  • Posts

    358
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PBWFan

  1. I think within the next 2-3 episodes everyone on that list is going to be made to be somehow involved to build and build to a reveal.

     

    I also think that Max & Abi THINK they killed Lucy because they had an altercation with her and then the next thing she was found dead. But I don't think it is them.

     

    We know now that she died at home. She did not die where she was found, she had head trauma. Now this explains why Max & Abi THINK they did it. However Ian also belted her across the face at home, then he stormed out the house, and then the next thing she was found dead.

     

    Denise was in the house in bed when Lucy died (if she died at home). Jane was also about. My theory is that Ian did it but does not yet know, because Denise/Jane (possibly others) moved the body in order to protect him. When we find out is is Ian, this is also when he comes to the realisation that he did this.

     

    I also see a link in Dot/Nick and Dot keeps mentioning drugs and this was a big factor in Lucy's downfall aswell. Just feel like Dot might have something to do with all of this in the aftermath? Perhaps pin the murder on Nick if he is infact dead? Say he confessed before he died?

     

    Its driving me mental. Seriously better TV than any wrestling crap over the last 10 years

  2. Jake Wood (the actor who plays Max Branning) wouldn't know who killed Lucy unless it was him. So it's not like he went into that scene knowing it was Abi and messed up.

     

    Mick Carter? load of balls aswell. He has has no motive whatsoever to kill Lucy. Hasnt been involved in any of the dialogue

     

    Unless you've done your homework over the last 2 months guys, don't waste your money on the EE30 market. 

     

    The odds are influenced by the betting pattern based on the "red herrings" the producers are putting in there to deliberately swerve you. 

     

    They are focusing on what Lauren THINKS she knows and also what Emma THOUGHT she knew before Lucy died. Wouldnt surprised me if those two turned out to be way off the dial and didn't have a clue in the first place but merely speculated as to what happened.

  3. F*ck him, it's about time these twats got a taste of what real people deal with rather than piss about in the "Gym, Tan, Wrestle, Eat, Repeat" culture.

     

    WWE's statement sums it up. Not their problem is it? They can't change the law in the Emirates.

     

    Whinges about other people not respecting his culture or lifestyle, and then in one tweet shites on others' beliefs.

     

    Nothing at all against gay guys or anything at all like that. But that's just the way it is over there with stuff like that. If I went there with my missus i'd be facing the same nonsense for giving her a kiss in public or holding her hand. 

  4.  

    brock goes back to ufc and rollins and danielson then get in a story line which leads to title match

     

     

    Pretty confident there's not gonna be a market for this bet

     

    This isn't a wrestling predictions thread

  5.  

    Has anyone seen the 2007 Monday Night War Legends Roundtable? Christ on a bike, I know he was obnoxious, but you sort of felt sorry for Bischoff.

    Yep. It wasn't exactly a fair fight. Pretty much all of the other guys at the table were working for WWF when WCW had them on their knees and didn't seem like they wanted to give Bischoff an easy ride.

     

    Michael Hayes absolutely out his bin aswell in that episode, Not sure it's coffee in those mugs.

  6.  

    wooly keeps sending me tips that don't come in.

    That's actually why I don't post every bet and only really post when something good happens or something catastrophic (like my super long post.) Though I do post too often in here still.

     

    I hate being the reason why someone loses money, it makes me feel terrible and why I'm usually hesitant. It's never because I want to keep all the good tips for myself, I just know losses happen a lot and don't want to put others out of pocket because of my bets.

     

    Maybe I should have been more specific.

     

    He randomly sent me them without me ever asking once

     

    I checked my inbox after a few weeks away at xmas, I see a tip for a treble. Telling me to go and stick a hundred sheets. I reply out of curiosty to ask him if it came in. He said no.

     

    If I am honest R&H you seem reasonably wise with your betting strategy and I always actually quite enjoy seeing what you've been up to.

  7. So an entire episode of River City (I honestly don't watch it - got a txt from a friend to put it on) has just been on and was based almost entirely around Grado making a guest appearance (pretty much as Grado, albeit under the name Buster for some reason).  He was an old friend of some female character and the show ended with her taking her old dementia patient to see Grado/Buster face Jack Jeckyl at a wrestling show.  Wasn't just the usual wrestling spot either, he interacted with quite a few characters and was in scenes all the way through the episode.  Some tremendous exposure for the guy. They aired a trailer for the ICW documentary sequel at the end of the show too.  Nicely done.

     

    It wasn't a guest slot, he has joined the show full time. Was in all the papers a few months ago.

     

    The Insane Fight Club director also directs River City

  8.  

    had a good day yesterday 43 wins 35 loses so over allim 169 wins 155 loses

     

    the odds for points spreads & over/unders is 1.9 across the board. so 1.9 x 1100 = 2090 (this is if you bet £1 a time)

    £2000 is your stake money and £90 profit. this would take you about 5 weeks to do 2000 bets. and then you can double your bets.

     

    2000 bets does not take as long as you may think. if you average 40 games a day and do them same games for the day across say 5 bookies thats 200 bets a day. so it would only take you about 10 days to place 2000 bets.

     

     

    I dont understand? First you say it would take 5 weeks to do £2000 of bets and then you say it would take 10 days to do it? Why are you placing the same bets 5 times at 5 different bookies when youre only staking a pound at each one? 

     

    And also, if you are betting at 1.9 every time, you only have 169 winners from 324 bets, thats 52.1% of winners. But betting at 1.9 (or 9/10 if youre old fashioned like me) then you are effectively betting at 52.63% on each bet so you are actually currently running at a loss., a £2.90 loss I make it. Even if you do make £90 over a 5 week period like you say, I think thats very difficulty but hey ho, is it really worth all of the work and effort, many hours by the looks of it, for effectively £90 a month? If you enjoy it then fair enough.

     

    Put it this way, for 2014 im currently running at a return of 113.8% off of 909 bets. Thats 909 bets in a whole year, and youre placing 2000 in a month?

     

    Sorry if I feel like im being overly critical, but you are posting these on a public forum where people are likely to blindly follow your bets so I think any system should be open to criticism and hopefully improvement. 

     

     

    Dunno why you're bothering. He is mainly ignoring everyone's questions and critiques and continues to post his results/bets on some of the most obscure sporting events one could put a punt on.

  9. ok yesterday i had 21 wins 16 losses so a very good day overall. so my over all record is 53 wins 48 loses.

     

    heres todays picks

     

    NCAAB

     

    Pennsylvania  @  Temple -14

    Eastern Illinois  @  Creighton -17.5

    Virginia Tech  @  Northern Iowa -9.5

    Air Force  @  Colorado -16

    SE Missouri State  @  Bowling Green -7

    Tennessee State  @  Virginia -33

    Hofstra  +4 @  South Florida

    Northern Arizona +6.5 @  Middle Tennesse

    Texas-Arlington  @  Kentucky -30.5

    Miami -4.5 @  Charlotte

    Miami (Ohio)  +8.5 @  Northwestern

    Troy  @  Southern Miss -10

    Arkansas  +5.5 @  SMU

    Akron  +4 @  Penn State

    Houston  @  Harvard -11

    The Citadel  @  Florida State -22

    Loyola of Chicago  @  Texas-San Antonio -1

    Delaware  @  Stanford -23.5

    CS Fullerton  @ Southern Cal -5

    Idaho  @  Boise State -14.5

    Saint Peters  @  Rutgers -9.5

    Nebraska Omaha  +15.5 @  Nebraska

    IUPUI  @  Drake -9

     

    NBA

     

    spread

     

    sacramento +3 @ new orleans

    detroit +3 @ milwaukee

    atlanta +6.5 @ washington

    golden state -5.5 @ miami

    chicago +5 @ denver

     

    over/unders

     

    sacramento @ new orleans 203.5 under

    detroit @ milwaukee 191 under

    atlanta @ washington 199.5 under

    golden state @ miami 197 over

    chicago @ denver 202.5 under

     

    NHL

     

    over/unders

     

    New Jersey @ Vancouver 5.5 under

    Edmonton @ Dallas 5.5 over

    Ottawa @ St. Louis 5 over

    Colorado @ Arizona 5.5 over

    Winnipeg @ Columbus 5.5 over

    Calgary @ Anaheim 5.5 over

    Los Angeles @ Nashville 5 over

    New Jersey @ Vancouver5.5 under

     

     

    there may be 1 or 2 picks added through the day so keep a eye out. and good luck

     

    What sort of stakes/bets are you doing with these picks?

  10. Walter Smith used to send him for a drink at half time if he wasnt playing well. Perhaps not the best support an alchoholic could hope for.

     

    With the party culture at Rangers in the 90s, those players seemed to be on the sauce every other day. Drinking until all hours on a matchday. It was those years that likely sent him well on his way.

     

    He stated in his book the only reason he went to Spurs over Man Utd was because Spurs gave him everything he asked for when signing on, even stupid stuff like a Car for his dad and a house for his parents.

  11. The Dudleys said they otped to not re-sign with WWE because they don't have a tag division and there would generally be nobody for them to feud with or work with. Maybe theyre a bit more up for it now. Batista mentioned in his book how he didnt like him at all and from what i gathered Randy Orton pretty much feels the same, so that may have a bearing on whether or not they want them back.

  12. PCW released their own t-shirt for one of their shows and he had put his own face on it amongst the wrestlers.

     

    What I don't like about Fludder is his constant need to tell us all his business strategies. Always on Facebook constantly telling us why he does this and why he does that. He should be keeping his cards close to his chest if anything.

     

    He will be no doubt reading these threads thinking that people are writing stuff about him mainly down to jealousy. But that's not it, he really is just a pain in the arse.

  13. Well aye that is exactly what I am saying. I gave an example of the type of fanfare he attracts. That incident happened in front of my own eyes.

     

    If you do a bit of groundwork you'd find that you guys are probably underestimating how many people actually know who he is. 1million people watched Insane Fight Club. with a further two hundred thousand or so in in iplayer views and downloads. Thats about 6 times WWE's UK audience and about 3 times TNA's. It would be absolutely impossible to watch that programme and not come away knowing who Grado is.

  14. No. I've not misunderstood it. I did say in the confines of Scotland he was pretty much a household name and that is due to various non-wrestling related projects and the documentary itself which was watched by over 1million viewers in Scotland alone. The documentary opened other avenues in the media for him and introduced him to a wider audience who might not necessarily know much about Wrestling.

     

     

    So maybe you could define to me what you think a "household name" is?

×
×
  • Create New...