Jump to content

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Max Power said:

I know what you said.

I was writing what you could have said.

She's bias.

Sorry, I misunderstood what you were saying.

I disagree, but there’s no way I can actually prove that. All I can do is point out why I think it’s unhelpful

And also, *biased

EDIT: Chest beat me to it...

Edited by RedRooster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, RedRooster said:

. It’s no secret that Cummings favours a move towards a US style system of news delivery.

And a US style of government. Peter fucking Bone of all people raised the issue that we have a parliamentary democracy and not a presidential democracy. Stuff should be announced in the house  first and not in the media. But then scrutiny isn’t something enjoyed by this government 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Keith Houchen said:

Peter fucking Bone of all people raised the issue that we have a parliamentary democracy and not a presidential democracy.

He is a horrible right wing cunt but all I can here when I see or hear the name Mr Peter Bone, all I hear in my head is Bercow saying his name. Hearing this didn't help either. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@RedRooster please explain the difference between a member of the sage committee meetings going to visit someone and another member of the sage committee meetings meeting someone. And then as a follow up, why did the journalist reporting both defend one and condemn the other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same, Lion. Playing Forza and always have the classical station on. Whenever that comes on that’s all I sing. 
Speaking of consistent journalism. We now go to walking forehead Brendan O’Neill. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jesus Christ, it is biased isn't it. I'm 37 years old and consider myself reasonably intelligent - yet I've never once said biased. 

Carry on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Hannibal Scorch said:

@RedRooster please explain the difference between a member of the sage committee meetings going to visit someone and another member of the sage committee meetings meeting someone. And then as a follow up, why did the journalist reporting both defend one and condemn the other.

She didn’t ‘condemn’ Neil Ferguson. She praised the quality of the story. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Hannibal Scorch said:

@RedRooster please explain the difference between a member of the sage committee meetings going to visit someone and another member of the sage committee meetings meeting someone. And then as a follow up, why did the journalist reporting both defend one and condemn the other.

Which SAGE committee member did she defend? I missed that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dominic Raab saying people should look at themselves in the mirror for politicising this. Big words from Dom as he himself doesn't have a reflection

(Second vampire joke this thread and i'm pleased with both)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Keith Houchen said:

Which SAGE committee member did she defend? I missed that. 

Dom’s added himself to the committee meetings. Allegedly 

Edited by Hannibal Scorch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, RedRooster said:

She didn’t ‘condemn’ Neil Ferguson. She praised the quality of the story. 

From her one sentence tweet that’s what you took from that. That she was praising great journalism. Also we could play a fun game thanks to @Factotum. Cummings or vampire? I’ll start you off 

image.thumb.jpeg.d093e9f750b66c0e186a9c2788aaa1d7.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Hannibal Scorch said:

Dom’s added himself to the committee meetings. Allegedly 

Ah right. Yeah he isn’t on the committee. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Hannibal Scorch said:

From her one sentence tweet that’s what you took from that. That she was praising great journalism. 

She literally said ‘that’s a hell of a story’. That’s quite clearly saying it was a great story, not condemning Ferguson. To say otherwise is simply reading what you want to into it.

Anyway, this story is about Cummings and the focus should be on him. And Grant Shapps. That was one trainwreck of a briefing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...