Paid Members chokeout Posted June 15, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted June 15, 2011 How long has he got to respond? *searches for popcorn gif* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Astro Hollywood Posted June 15, 2011 Moderators Share Posted June 15, 2011 I guess within the day that he next makes a post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 Specifically, he asks how can one be made to perform Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steveo2007 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 He was right in the middle of the mayhem then! Press TV have been saying the youtube videos featuring filming of the court room have been removed by request of the government, hence this one being distorted. I find the whole "This content is not available in your country due to a government removal request" a bit worrying if I'm honest. Hardly something that is going to corrupt a nation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynamite Duane Posted June 16, 2011 Author Share Posted June 16, 2011 I reckon if (more like when) Duane fails to respond to the points raised by Lister he should be given another suspension since he has clearly failed to grasp the reasons for his last suspension. Â So it is written, so it shall be done. Â Duane, respond to Lister's post, or spend another 30 days in the Spaz Bin. Right that me just make this clear, by me sharing information on a subject or item of news doesn't mean I have all the answers. However I'll attempt to answer what I DO understand and have knowledge of. I tend to share stuff like this for others to look at and come to their own conclusions. Â I'll happily answer Lister's post Woyzeck from what currently I understand. There is a difference between Law and Statutes, statutes are by CONSENT, a PERSON consents by entering into a CONTRACT. A Magistrates Court is a place of business and by stepping into the court and into the DOCK you choose you CONTRACT by representing your PERSON. The magistrates is not a COMMON LAW court when you are have a jury and are judged by your peers, it is a LEGAL court not LAWFUL. There is a difference between what is lawful and what is LEGAL. Causing harm, damage or loss is breaking the law. If Roger Hayes stole a car he would've broke a law, however if he parked on a yellow line that would ILLEGAL. There is a clear difference between LEGAL and LAWFUL. The Police and Judiciary are known to act unlawful, they swear an oath. The fact is we are governed by consent. Â Lister, I hope that gives you good understanding of my perspective, you don't have to agree with me, call it bullshit I'm not bothered, I'm interested in opening peoples eyes to what is happening and how power is abused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Chris B Posted June 16, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted June 16, 2011 A court is a place of business? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members JNLister Posted June 16, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted June 16, 2011 You know the expression "swallowed a dictionary?" Â Looks like somebody swallowed a thesaurus and then vomited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynamite Duane Posted June 16, 2011 Author Share Posted June 16, 2011 Question: if I punch Roger Hayes, get taken to court, and the judge gives me a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Astro Hollywood Posted June 16, 2011 Moderators Share Posted June 16, 2011 Right that me just make this clear, by me sharing information on a subject or item of news doesn't mean I have all the answers. Â The point of these 30 day bans is that you've long since worn out our good graces to let things slide, when you constantly start these threads and never respond when someone cuts the nonsense down with facts, only to start another one in its place, that also gets abandoned when you can't deal. If you want to fill the forum with this kind of conspiracy wackiness, then do so under the proviso there's no more hit-and-running. If you post something, you'll either see it out, or take another holiday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 me sharing information on a subject or item of news doesn't mean I have all the answers... I tend to share stuff like this for others to look at and come to their own conclusions... ...I'm interested in opening peoples eyes to what is happening and how power is abused.  These two statements are contradictory. Please clarify. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynamite Duane Posted June 16, 2011 Author Share Posted June 16, 2011 I'm just passionate about this kind of stuff Loki, yes I've come to my own conclusion, it's then up to others to decide for themselves, you can't someone to change their opinion or believe something, they decide from themselves what is wrong or right. I don't wish to force my opinion on anyone, ignore me if you like Sorry if that appears contradictory, my point is I'm not here for an argument, arguing achieves nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Astro Hollywood Posted June 16, 2011 Moderators Share Posted June 16, 2011 I'm just passionate about this kind of stuff Loki, yes I've come to my own conclusion, it's then up to others to decide for themselves. Sorry if that appears contradictory, my point is I'm not here for an argument, arguing achieves nothing. Â It's not an argument people are looking for, it's a response to people disproving - easily, I might add - the nonsense you put up here. Â Still, best to keep those blinkers on, eh? Don't think too hard about the holes, or your world will come a'crumblin' down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynamite Duane Posted June 16, 2011 Author Share Posted June 16, 2011 Fair enough, there have been times when I haven't replied, that's me avoiding confrontation on some occasions. I apologise for those instances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 I'm just passionate about this kind of stuff Loki, yes I've come to my own conclusion, it's then up to others to decide for themselves, you can't someone to change their opinion or believe something, they decide from themselves what is wrong or right. I don't wish to force my opinion on anyone, ignore me if you like Sorry if that appears contradictory, my point is I'm not here for an argument, arguing achieves nothing. Â This is a discussion forum. If you're not prepared to discuss what you post, you shouldn't be allowed to post it, especially when you post such contentious (and frankly nonsensical) stuff. Â In this case, it's not even a case of coming to your own conclusion. You, and these campaigners, are quite simply wrong. They've misunderstood the law as it stands, as Lister explained succinctly. Â Let's say I post this argument - "Duane is Gay. Duane is from Bournemouth. Therefore all people from Bournemouth are gay". Â I've made a simple logic mistake. No matter how many arguments or evidence I hand off the back of that statement, it is untrue and is simply and easily disproved. Only you are gay If I continued to post stories about how random people from Bournemouth are gay, it wouldn't help. If I said "well, this is my opinion, I'm not interested in yours" that wouldn't make me any less wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynamite Duane Posted June 16, 2011 Author Share Posted June 16, 2011 Point taken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.