WHERES LEROY Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 Didnt they do the streak v streak angle when Edge and Taker faced off at Wrestlemania 24? Â Â No. And quite rightly so too, considering that he was a loser at WM23. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infamous Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 I've seen Raw and don't mind seeing the thread, I was just thinking about those who might not have. But I forgot what day it was if I'm being honest (thought it was Wednesday) so thought Raw was still fresh, my apologies. Â I don't think they're going to add any extra reason other than the streak (for example, Triple H's career). If they want to go with Triple H wanting revenge for his best friend and also break the streak in the process they don't really need any more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Miz Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 It looks like Taker has already excepted a HHH match at Mania so adding HHH's career on the line now would be a little pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Minipops Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 Didnt they do the streak v streak angle when Edge and Taker faced off at Wrestlemania 24? Â Â No. And quite rightly so too, considering that he was a loser at WM23. Â Did Edge not get round that saying it was in the Money in the Bank match? Â I could have swore that in the build up to them facing each other at Mania 24 Edge went on about it being streak vs streak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 Didnt they do the streak v streak angle when Edge and Taker faced off at Wrestlemania 24? Â Â No. And quite rightly so too, considering that he was a loser at WM23. Â Did Edge not get round that saying it was in the Money in the Bank match? Â I could have swore that in the build up to them facing each other at Mania 24 Edge went on about it being streak vs streak. You're right, he did. They just completely ignored his loss the year before, though, I don't think he even tried to get around it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Minipops Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 Didnt they do the streak v streak angle when Edge and Taker faced off at Wrestlemania 24? Â Â No. And quite rightly so too, considering that he was a loser at WM23. Â Did Edge not get round that saying it was in the Money in the Bank match? Â I could have swore that in the build up to them facing each other at Mania 24 Edge went on about it being streak vs streak. You're right, he did. They just completely ignored his loss the year before, though, I don't think he even tried to get around it. Â As stupid as that it it doesnt surprise me that they just ignored the loss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty Eddie Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 Didnt they do the streak v streak angle when Edge and Taker faced off at Wrestlemania 24? Â Â No. And quite rightly so too, considering that he was a loser at WM23. Â Did Edge not get round that saying it was in the Money in the Bank match? Â I could have swore that in the build up to them facing each other at Mania 24 Edge went on about it being streak vs streak. You're right, he did. They just completely ignored his loss the year before, though, I don't think he even tried to get around it. Â Was that the MOTB where Edge took a big fall and ''broke a ladder in half' on the outside and got the stretcher treatment? Â If so, he well could have blagged that away, especially as a Heel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 Was that the MOTB where Edge took a big fall and ''broke a ladder in half' on the outside and got the stretcher treatment? If so, he well could have blagged that away, especially as a Heel. Aye it was, but as far as I can remember, there was no sense of blagging involved, it wasn't mentioned. Undertaker isn't the sort of character that can come down and point it out, which is fair enough, but I don't think the commentators or anyone did so. It just seemed weird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.