QUOTE (Lumber Jack @ Dec 7 2009, 22:17)

QUOTE (JNLister @ Dec 7 2009, 20:57)

The other thing I love about this thread is that everytime somebody completely misunderstands the entire point of it, you get a picture of a hot woman as compensation.
YOU misunderstand , man. Of course each and every female on this thread is hot. At least to someone. Thats why they are mentioned.
They're just less conventional. Hey man, each to their own, and many people share what they find to be attractive.
They are also less commercial, a bonus because they might still be hot. Its just you, and probably a lot of other blokes, won't have heard of them yet.
Its all in the topic title, dude.
I don't know if you're being serious, but in case you are, I should point out that YOU've completely missed the point and misunderstood Lister's post.
He's not talking about if they're hot or not, or the subjectivity with which people consider these women to be hot. He's talking about the fact that this thread states that it's about unconventional or less commercial beauties, and Sarah Alexander is neither. She's a very conventional beauty, fulfilling most of the standard qualities attributed to beautiful women, and she is most certainly conventional, having been on mainstream TV.
What Lister was saying was that the good thing about this thread is that even when someone completely fails to understand that we're looking for unconventionally beautiful and less commercially beautiful women and goes and posts a conventional and/or commercial beauty, we're still getting a picture of a hot woman to compensate for this failure.