Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: General politics discussion thread
UKFF > Main > Off Topic
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83
Mr. Seven
Was it just me who thought that apart from Griffin being a bit of a Nazi, they were all the same? All pushing their own selfish agendas and such. Perhaps it's my general distrust of politicians but I really don't think anybody came across paticularly well. Even Bonnie shilled her museum.
David
QUOTE (Woyzeck @ Oct 22 2009, 23:59) *
I guess posts like yours are at least an insight into how a BNP voter would view all that.


laugh.gif

QUOTE (Woyzeck @ Oct 22 2009, 23:59) *
And I don't know what Twitter you're using, but overwhelmingly the response seems to be:

- Griffin is an absolute fuckwit and a vile shambles of a man
- Straw is still a cock
- Bonnie Greer for Queen~!


The point is, we know Griffin is a fool, thats not news.

I'm saying that I have spent all week hearing about this great dismantling that we were going to see.

What happened to it?

Griffin spent most of the show fucking laughing at Straw and Warsi arguing with each other.
The Cum Doctor
We were never going to see the dismantling that we should have seen. Comments like the fucking atrocious "Dick ... Nick Griffin." one sums up exactly why. Nobody was interested in being impartial and just gradually outing him as a prick. They wanted to go in with the big two footed tackles. Thankfully, Griffin managed to fuck up anyways. The worst being his comments on the BBC. He was basically handed an olive branch with that one. What the fuck was he thinking ?!?!
David
I was hoping he would have been asked about other pressing issues of the day, such as the Mail strike, the economy etc.

He would have anticipated the race shit, so would have been prepared for it somewhat.

He did fuck up with the BBC statement though.
Rob Lowe
QUOTE
Griffin spent most of the show fucking laughing at Straw and Warsi arguing with each other.

No he didnt. Straw and Warsi had a couple of exchanges and that was about it.

I'm pleased because a smarter man could use the show to promote how he is being treated unfairly and ganged up on. Unfortunately for the BNP supporters, Griffins arguments were weak and looked like a sweaty fool. It wasnt a total disaster, but I thought he looked terrible.

Hopefully the main parties can pull themselves together after this and create opposing manifestos that people can compare. Then the public wont be left feeling out of the loop and just vote for the BNP as a 'fuck you' to the main parties.
Astro Hollywood
QUOTE (hardcore_harry @ Oct 23 2009, 1:04) *
QUOTE (Woyzeck @ Oct 22 2009, 23:59) *
I guess posts like yours are at least an insight into how a BNP voter would view all that.


laugh.gif


I put that because I thought I remembered you saying that at some point. Apologies if that's wrong.

But yeah, it was always going to be a bit of a pantomime with the big build-up, but as others have said, he's so stupid and so obviously hiding his facism behind these paper-thin facades that it took almost nothing for him to completely expose himself.
bobbins
QUOTE (hardcore_harry @ Oct 23 2009, 0:45) *
But the Labour party took a real beating tonight.

What? Jack Straw clearly came off the best of the three main party representatives (I particularly liked his Dr. Strangelove line). It's a shame he was never allowed to fully explain the progress Labour has made with their immigration policy.
David
QUOTE (Woyzeck @ Oct 23 2009, 0:11) *
I put that because I thought I remembered you saying that at some point. Apologies if that's wrong.


I did indeed vote BNP in the Euro elections, and i'm glad I did.

I'm very anti-EU, and oppose the centralisation of Europe, and seeing fools like the BNP members who got voted in represent it makes me feel all fuzzy inside.

I presume you'll be withdrawing your apology?

QUOTE (bobbins @ Oct 23 2009, 0:13) *
What? Jack Straw clearly came off the best of the three main party representatives (I particularly liked his Dr. Strangelove line). It's a shame he was never allowed to fully explain the progress Labour has made with their immigration policy.


Yeah, a real shame.

I'll be happy to see the Tories come in next year.
Astro Hollywood
QUOTE (hardcore_harry @ Oct 23 2009, 1:14) *
QUOTE (Woyzeck @ Oct 23 2009, 0:11) *
I put that because I thought I remembered you saying that at some point. Apologies if that's wrong.


I did indeed vote BNP in the Euro elections, and i'm glad I did.

I'm very anti-EU, and oppose the centralisation of Europe, and seeing fools like the BNP members who got voted in represent it makes me feel all fuzzy inside.

I presume you'll be withdrawing your apology?


Like Nick Griffin's wang from a man's anus in the eventual gay scandal I'll be praying for.
David
Maybe if we get our referendum next year i'll not be able to vote for the BNP in the next EU election wink.gif
soretooth
Griffin's hands and voice were really badly shaking. You could tell that it was the biggest night of his life. I can't imagine what it must feel like going on TV under that much pressure, knowing how hated you are.

He came across very badly, to my mind; really creepy. Can't imagine anyone who watched tonight thinking yeah, I'll vote for his party, he seems good. I doubt many potential or undecided BNP voters even know Question Time exists though.
patdfb
QUOTE (bobbins @ Oct 23 2009, 1:13) *
QUOTE (hardcore_harry @ Oct 23 2009, 0:45) *
But the Labour party took a real beating tonight.

What? Jack Straw clearly came off the best of the three main party representatives (I particularly liked his Dr. Strangelove line). It's a shame he was never allowed to fully explain the progress Labour has made with their immigration policy.



Bobbins how do you figure Jack Straw came of best of the main 3 I thought Huhne won it but was a shiet showing alround.. Warsi trying to hide her seeming homophobia by skirting around erm what people can and cant do was hilarious.

I cant take jack Straw seriously as he looks like the Demon Head Master, and he doesnt have a grip on his own constituency according to the people that live there.

He got called on Immgration on QT and bottled it trying to attack the BNP and deflect the issue.. rather than answer the question. Ffs even Huhne tried to blame the Tories for the emss and they havent been in power since 1997.. Why can they just say we fucked up, this is how we will fix it.. Its not hard.. I think a bit of honest from the main parties wouldnt go a miss and may go someway to repairing the mistrust in politics..


A few we fucked it up admissions would be a start
TheSlickster
Have to say I loved Jack Straw absolutely shitting himself the entire hour, he could barely calm himself down to waffle out an answer most of the time.

A classic moment was when Nick Griffin was referring to his visit to Libya and telling Gaddafi to stop funding the IRA

Straw's response after a moment of silence - "......well you were trying to get him to fund you instead!!!!"

Nice one Jack laugh.gif
nfc90210
QUOTE (Woyzeck @ Oct 23 2009, 0:48) *
He looked incredibly uncomfortable too - hands shaking, voice shaking, sweaty, that silly little "I'm in on the joke" chuckling all the way through, and the frail-mask slipped totally at end with the stuff about two men kissing being "creepy."


I don't think Griffin looked uncomfortable at all during the show. To me it seemed like he really didn't care what people (ie the panel and hostile audience) thought of him, and was having a great time because he loves attention.

As for the show, it went as I thought it would.

The kind of people who are going to agree with Nick Griffin will think that he did well. They'll think it was a hit job. That he handled it well, and that he made good points. For instance, when he went into his little rant about the gays I thought it was funny. The kind of people who hold those views will think that Griffin is one of the only people in British politics speaking for them.

Everyone else will think that he came across badly.
Tequila_Boy
Are you serious? The nervous laugh he did throughout the show was just showing how mcuh he was shitting himself
David
There's actually been a much better debate on Radio 5 live for the past hour or so.
Enter Raven
Was anyone really hoping they would all just stop, and then every time Griffin tried to say something they'd say "you're a dousche", every time, cut him straight off.

Fromy where I was sitting, the Tory was the only one that came off respectably, and that was more due to a good ability for public speaking than anything else. Poor selection of panel members, where were the aggressive rabble raisers all sat poised to tear him apart?
nfc90210
QUOTE (Tequila_Boy @ Oct 23 2009, 1:51) *
Are you serious? The nervous laugh he did throughout the show was just showing how mcuh he was shitting himself


I actually thought that was a symptom of nervous excitement more than anything else.
bobbins
QUOTE (TheSlickster @ Oct 23 2009, 1:44) *
Have to say I loved Jack Straw absolutely shitting himself the entire hour, he could barely calm himself down to waffle out an answer most of the time.

A classic moment was when Nick Griffin was referring to his visit to Libya and telling Gaddafi to stop funding the IRA

Straw's response after a moment of silence - "......well you were trying to get him to fund you instead!!!!"

Nice one Jack laugh.gif

That wasn't a joke. That was genuinely what Griffin was doing there. It took Straw to point that out, nobody else would have done it.

QUOTE
Bobbins how do you figure Jack Straw came of best of the main 3 I thought Huhne won it but was a shiet showing alround.. Warsi trying to hide her seeming homophobia by skirting around erm what people can and cant do was hilarious.

I cant take jack Straw seriously as he looks like the Demon Head Master, and he doesnt have a grip on his own constituency according to the people that live there.

He got called on Immgration on QT and bottled it trying to attack the BNP and deflect the issue.. rather than answer the question. Ffs even Huhne tried to blame the Tories for the emss and they havent been in power since 1997.. Why can they just say we fucked up, this is how we will fix it.. Its not hard.. I think a bit of honest from the main parties wouldnt go a miss and may go someway to repairing the mistrust in politics..


A few we fucked it up admissions would be a start

Well I can't believe that I'm defending Jack Straw but I was listening to what he said rather than thinking that he looked like the Demon Headmaster. As for immigration, you seem to want simple answers to very complex questions. Apologise and fix it, isn't really a nuanced position. He was giving honest answers about what they're trying to do to solve problems linked to immigration. It will never be a perfect situation, you just have to work to come up with ways of making it as fair as possible.
nfc90210
Also, going off-topic, Bonnie Greer turns sixty-one next month. She looks well on it.
SpursRiot2012
That Warsi is definatly fuckable
PowerButchi
QUOTE (nfc90210 @ Oct 23 2009, 2:04) *
Also, going off-topic, Bonnie Greer turns sixty-one next month. She looks well on it.


Really? I wouldn't chuck one up her.
patdfb
QUOTE (bobbins @ Oct 23 2009, 2:02) *
Well I can't believe that I'm defending Jack Straw but I was listening to what he said rather than thinking that he looked like the Demon Headmaster. As for immigration, you seem to want simple answers to very complex questions. Apologise and fix it, isn't really a nuanced position. He was giving honest answers about what they're trying to do to solve problems linked to immigration. It will never be a perfect situation, you just have to work to come up with ways of making it as fair as possible.


Hey I * always* to what the Demon Headmaster says, the swirly eyes thing has got it going on.


Seriously though.. Yes, there are very complex and multiple, multiple issues re immgration. To stop it incorporating every aspect of everything, though it may be best to start with something simple, just so that there is at least a common starting point. Rather than now where by e everything is a quick fix, keen jerk or is waffle or conjecture without much planning.


Labour adopt the Australian sytem re points for immigration. Okay has that solved the issue? No? why not? Has anything Labour has done including combined UK Border taskforce or whatever its called solve the issue? No.. Has fining lorry drivers for bringing illegal immigrants over despite not knowing they are stowed away solved the problem, No? and so on.


Is there a problem? I dont really think so. The issue has been distorted beyond all kinds of normalcy by political manouvering and getting one over on the other parties, the media, pandering to the media for sound bites and gross misrepresentation of the situation.


Yes there are parts of the UK that have become ghettoised to whatever ethnic mix and there are places I suspect where English isnt the first language. So What?, Hows that different to say the US where Spanish is taking a foothold in many areas and South American/Cuban ghettos are predominate?

What people seem to be upset with is that its all about the effect on them and their percieved way of life. We are Brits dont you know and therefore things should be done properly. Iam sorry, afaik, The UK/Britain/whatever has depended on skilled migrants for a very long time. Appeals for help rebuilding to 'The Empire' after WW2 is just one example of how we as a comibnation of nations have reached out and asked for help.


This time though, we are not asking for help, instead it appears that the Eastern Europeans and Iraqis and so on are coming over to take 'our' jobs threaten 'our' way of life and threaten everything that is known. Its bollocks of course., There are jobs, its just attitudes have changed and now some types of work is considered beneath ordinary Brits. Cleaning, Fruit picking etc.. So the wages may be crap, its a job irrespective. There was a Bbc News programme recently where some fruit pickers, who used to have what was a Busman's Holiday each summer went back to the farm they used to pick on. The people now picking were all Poles. It could be claimed minimum wage, oh no poor them!... Its phsyical work, traditionally shit paid.. However, it gets people fit active and serves a purpose. It also looked like it could have been a good laugh. Those returning to visit admitted it was as much and though modern methods had changed the way fruit is harvested it still was a lot of fun with comeradery etc.

Me point is its considered to be beneath some people to work like that; so they dont. People can harp on about benefit scroungers and dossers ect but these too have always been about.

So what exactly is the issue? People doing jobs no one else seemingly wants to do? A loss of national identity (always going to happpen to some extent with the world becoming smaller through tech etc)? The loss of language? Langauge will evolves and people from even the turn of the 1900s wouldnt recognise English as it is as meanings are changed, grammar changes and words change. The Blade Runner mash up of different languages could be considered where things are heading ultimately.


The thing is its change people fear.. Britain, UK whatever is no longer the force it thinks or ever thought it was. We as a nation have to accept we are not going to be among the global forerunners and that we do need help and that things will change things happen and life goes on. Immigration . allowed or illegal is going to be a part of this come what may. A straight forward and simple start point may help cut through all of the bullshit and misnomas and actually change peoples perceptions in the long run, instead of 'Holy shit! they are all immigrants and they dont speak english! Look! they want all their customs! What about my way of life? We will be ruined!'.. and so on that we are force fed as being the view in the interim.

A simple start yes, plain speaking no game playing cutting through all the bullshit and just saying how it is will be a start. an apology for all the dressed up and insome cases complete crap policys changes and behaviour of our politics and politicians would be a fine start and could help things in the long run.


AS a side note, Baroness Warsi really not with this gay thing http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-5489.html
bobbins
If I understand you correctly, your problem is not with any aspect of immigration, but with the general public's irrational media-fuelled fears of immigration. I really don't see what amount of "plain-speaking" from leading politicians can solve that problem.
tiger_rick
I was expecting Straw to make a tit of himself on immigration after the butchered quote Harry posted before the show but I don't think he did. He's definitely in denial if he genuinely thinks fears about immigration haven't increased BNP support but what he said about it was right. Stuff like putting a cap on population is impossible.

It was a good show. Griffin made an absolute tit of himself. He was shown up totally as a lying bastard who cannot back up any of the things he spews. I thought Waasi was the best guest. She conducted herself well, made good counter arguments and didn't have her head in the sand about key issues.

The only fear I have is how large the proportion of people who, like Harry, somehow feel that Griffin came off well on the show is. All we've heard from the media in the last few days is that British people are intelligent enough to make their own minds up about the BNP. I don't think that is true for a lot of people.
Yoghurt
QUOTE (tiger_rick @ Oct 23 2009, 8:52) *
I was expecting Straw to make a tit of himself on immigration after the butchered quote Harry posted before the show but I don't think he did. He's definitely in denial if he genuinely thinks fears about immigration haven't increased BNP support but what he said about it was right. Stuff like putting a cap on population is impossible.

It was a good show. Griffin made an absolute tit of himself. He was shown up totally as a lying bastard who cannot back up any of the things he spews. I thought Waasi was the best guest. She conducted herself well, made good counter arguments and didn't have her head in the sand about key issues.

The only fear I have is how large the proportion of people who, like Harry, somehow feel that Griffin came off well on the show is. All we've heard from the media in the last few days is that British people are intelligent enough to make their own minds up about the BNP. I don't think that is true for a lot of people.


Bingo, the general media has sorely overestimated the general intelligence of the native populace. The belief Griffin came off well according to some people in spite of reality is utterly indicative of their support no matter what, and their ill reasoning isn't going to be changed by logic nor fact.
ReturnOfTheMack
QUOTE
Last night, as Bonnie Greer prepared to enter the electric atmosphere of the BBC Question Time studio, she came face to face with Nick Griffin for the first time.

"It was the strangest thing because as I came out of my dressing room prepared for combat, it was as if he'd been waiting for me in the corridor," she says.

"I was the last to emerge and when he saw me, he turned and smiled his greasy smile and clumsily half extended a hand. I ignored it and thought to myself: what are you about? Are you forgetting I'm black? Are you forgetting you called me a black history fabricator? Are you trying to show me you aren't racist?"

But the off-camera behaviour of the leader of the far-right British National Party towards Greer, a black Chicago-born writer who became a British citizen 11 years ago, was to become even more bizarrely ingratiating as they entered the studio.

"We were seated next to each other and as we were having our microphones attached, he leaned towards me like I was his new best friend and tried to make small talk. "Bonnie, how many times have you been on?" he asked. "Bonnie, do you find it scary?" I looked him straight in the eye. "No," I replied sharply, "but you might."

Speaking exclusively to the Evening Standard immediately after filming at Television Centre in west London, Greer, 60, describes - over a stiff vodka - the ordeal of sitting next to Griffin as "probably the weirdest and most creepy experience of my life".

"I spent the entire night with my back turned to him. At one point, I had to restrain myself from slapping him. But it was worth it," she insists, "because he was totally trounced. I had thought we'd face a formidable orator, somebody who knew his facts and had his ducks in a row but the guy was a mess!

"From the moment the audience began shooting questions, it was a case of the Emperor's new clothes. He was completely exposed as an evasive liar who couldn't even stand up his own quotes and looked like a buffoon."

The other panellists - Justice Secretary Jack Straw, shadow minister for community cohesion Sayeda Warsi, and Lib Dem home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne - came down on him like a ton of bricks, she says.

"They were formidably prepared with quotes and statistics, and [host] David Dimbleby was excellent at holding him to account. I don't know if the cameras picked this up but Griffin was trembling and shaking like a leaf.

"There was a pivotal moment in the show when Dimbleby pressed him on whether he was still a Holocaust denier and he just looked totally bereft. For a couple of seconds there was a deafening silence. It was an amazing moment. You could see the panel thinking, 'He's done for'.

"He had climbed in the ring with some heavyweights and in all honesty, he got slapped around. The audience and the panel took him down time after time. It was a blood sport. He looked totally out of his depth. I was shocked by how ill-prepared he was. He didn't seem to have credible answers to anything."

Before the show there were those who expressed concerns as to whether this elegant but softly-spoken intellectual would be robust enough to take on Griffin.

As the only non-politician on the panel, her job would be to lift the debate above party politics, but she'd need to be less the lofty academic and more the voice of the people.

Outside the BBC complex, hundreds of screaming anti-fascist protesters were engaged in running battles with the police because they believed Griffin - an MEP whose party won six per cent of the vote in the last European elections - should not have been invited.

At stake was the future credibility and popularity of the BNP and its leader who would no doubt try and present a sanitised version of himself and his party.

Was she satisfied with her performance?

During the show, which focused on making Griffin account for his pernicious views on subjects ranging from immigration to the Holocaust to homophobia, Greer was well received but came across more as a bemused lecturer than the feisty combative some had hoped for.

For example, when Griffin was asked to explain how the BNP could justify using Winston Churchill as its symbol, Bonnie pointed out that Churchill's American mother was rumoured to have Mohawk blood and that he could not have joined Griffin's "all-white" party.

Later she scolded Griffin for calling David Duke's Ku Klux Klan a "non-violent organisation" and said he was talking "BS".

And she invited him to the British Museum for a lesson to understand once and for all that there is no such thing as "the indigenous English people".

But it took a black audience member to really raise the roof when he told Griffin: "You're a disgrace. The vast majority of this audience find what you stand for to be completely disgusting."

Why was she not more strident in her attacks on him? "I didn't need to, because others like Jack Straw waded in so heavily. I felt my job was to subtly lampoon him, toy with him, expose the idiocy of his ideas.

"I didn't want to come across as the angry, screaming black woman pointing my finger and hollering because that's how people like Griffin and his supporters view black women. I saw us as a team - it wasn't an ego thing, wasn't as if I had to take him down all on my own."

There was a touching moment, she says, just before they started recording when Sayeda Warsi ran over to her and said: "Are you okay sitting next to Griffin?" "I said: 'I'm from Chicago, I'm not scared of this guy!' And we just hugged spontaneously. We were like two prize-fighters going into the ring to do battle."

Was it a tough choice to appear alongside Griffin on the show? "When I was asked I deliberated for days. As someone who grew up in America and who is more cultural than political, I wasn't sure what I'd bring to the table. But then I realised, I'm the only one on the panel who has chosen to come to this country.

"I chose to come here because I saw it as a country of decent, fair people. But also because this country gave my father, Ben Greer, who was a black sharecropper from Mississippi, his first decent experience of white people he'd ever had.

"He came here during the war, in a blacks-only unit as part of General Patton's army and was involved in the second wave of D-Day landings, and later he always spoke about how well the white working-class Brits had treated him, the very people who today are said to be turning to the BNP.

"My daddy always said that sunlight is the best disinfectant. So I decided to come for him, and also for my deceased white English mother-in-law, Joan Hutchins, who had never met a black person before she met me, and who welcomed me into her heart."

The day had begun with top-secret calls from Television Centre to Greer and the other panellists that they should be ready and dressed to go "any moment" and that cars would be dispatched to pick them up with "just 15 minutes notice".

Greer picked her outfit carefully: a demure dark top and jacket and on her wrist, a colourful African bead bracelet. "I was wearing the colours of Jamaica and of Africa," she laughs. "A touch of ethnic."

They were provided police contact numbers - and in Griffin's case a police escort - in case they had to change their route at the last moment.

At 6pm, with hundreds of protesters engaged in running skirmishes with the police out front, they were quietly smuggled in through a back entrance.

"Usually we all mingle in the green room before the show but there was no mingling this time and we all had our own private green rooms. The show itself was tense, like no Question Time I've ever experienced.

"To me, the stars though, were the audience. It was a typical London multicultural audience and they were just brilliant in the way they held Griffin to account. It made my job easy."

Does she think that the BNP membership would swell, despite Griffin's poor showing? "No, I think that young people watching the show who might have been tempted to join the BNP will think again after seeing his dismal performance.

"Having him on and holding him to account on such a public forum is like getting to interrogate the Wizard of Oz - he's been built up and up, but then you find he's just a windbag and there's nothing there."

At the end, she laughs ruefully, Griffin turned to her and gave her his business card. "Bizarre - I can't even begin to understand why."

She shrugs. "Afterwards, there is usually a communal supper for all the panellists. But not this time. Nobody could bring themselves to break bread with Nick Griffin."


Credit: Londonstandard.co.uk

Seems the people in the studio also thought he was bricking it.
Enter Raven
The only way to stop people voting BNP is to offer another option (like UKIP) that aren't nutbag fundamentalists but also aren't the big three. I wouldn't vote UKIP because they want to build fossil fuel plants everywhere and take down wind farms but you see the point I'm getting at.
David
QUOTE (tiger_rick @ Oct 23 2009, 7:52) *
The only fear I have is how large the proportion of people who, like Harry, somehow feel that Griffin came off well on the show is. All we've heard from the media in the last few days is that British people are intelligent enough to make their own minds up about the BNP. I don't think that is true for a lot of people.


What I mean when I say that Griffin came off well is that he wasn't shown up in a way that will change the minds of those that vote him or his councillors in at local elections up and down the country.

People are voting for him because they are most likely frightened and/or concerned by various issues such as immigration, which they feel the current Government isn't doing anything to keep tabs on.

I have to be honest, I don't think there is a major problem yet, but there definately has to be some sort of system put in place for the future, such as the Australian points system (which has been put into place).

However, I like to keep tabs on whats going on by watching political television shows and reading up on whats happening.

Granted, i'm more concerned by politics north of the border, but I keep up reasonably well with things down south too.

The problem with the show for me is this;

People who are voting for Griffins mob are having their opinions formed by what they read in the tabloid papers, and by what they are seeing on shows such as Border Patrol on Sky.

The majority of them aren't reading reputable newspapers or watching shows like QT on a regular basis, and with the state of politics in the UK I can't say that I really blame them.

Now, these BNP voters would have sat down last night to watch Griffin be challenged by questions put to him by what can be described as mainly black or asian audience members, with a few middle to upper class sounding whites thrown in as well.

These are the people that the people who vote for the BNP are complaining about.

Why not have some working class whites in there, maybe even some who voted for the BNP as a "protest vote", to put the questions to Griffin?

It would maybe have done the people at home a bit of good to see people "just like them" taking part, picking holes in Griffins arguments.

As it was, i've listened to a few radio phone-ins and the like, and there has been a fair amount of people mentioning words like "bullying, one-sided, unfair treatment," and the like.

I even heard one caller comparing Griffin to Joan of fucking Arc!

I didn't think it was wise to have Griffin shot down by the very people that some of his voters (disillusioned, not racist) feel alienated from.

In some ways, all it will have done is confirmed their doubts.

Also, the show scored over 7 million viewers. Thats three times more than their highest rating ever.

I'll be the first to suggest that Griffin should guest host Raw!
Enter Raven
QUOTE
I didn't think it was wise to have Griffin shot down by the very people that some of his voters (disillusioned, not racist) feel alienated from.

I watched it and to be fair, on the whole, the audience ask questions, if it's a decent or current question the panel then discuss it. The combination of the host and the other panel members were the ones who made Griffin look like a moron. The black dude in the front row who went on a rant pretty early came off like a moron himself to be honest. Griffin was incapable of answering nearly any direct question regardless of the creed of the individual asking.

Ultimately Griffin's getting a whole load of press and attention because Labour sent a personal invite to every country with a poor economy to send their entire population to England, and now BNP look like the apex of the forces opposing that motion. They're not, they're idiots. If you want immigration to improve, you may as well vote Tory and cut your losses on the stuff they don't do right, which everyone will.
Blackson Jackson
Watching it just now.

While I think it is the right thing to have partys like the BNP on Question Time (Free speech being a big factor and the ability to educate those that think the BNP are in the right). But it sometimes feels like a massive set-up to bully Griffin (some say he deserves it). In saying that Griffin has hurt himself, as he's denying things he's said to his members.
David
This article from the BBC's Gavin Hewitt hits the nail on the head for me;

QUOTE
The attention that British National Party leader Nick Griffin is currently receiving stems from the European elections. The BNP got nearly a million votes and ended up with two seats in the European parliament. He and Andrew Brons became MEPs. They have not, as yet, made any impact in Brussels, but perhaps that is not surprising as their aim is for Britain to withdraw from the EU.

Some people were surprised by the numbers who voted for a party which is regularly denounced as racist. There was a similar reaction in 2006 when the BNP won a clutch of council seats in Barking and Dagenham. I did a report on their campaign for the BBC's Ten O'Clock News. Initially I thought it would be difficult to find people who would openly admit on camera that they intended to vote for the far-right party. It was easier than I imagined.

At Dagenham Working Men's Club I found potential BNP voters, and some were willing to talk openly. Among then was a brick-layer, a trainee nurse and an electrician. I got them to look straight into the camera. They gave their names, their occupations and said they intended to vote for BNP. All were either former Labour voters or came from Labour-voting families. None of them knew much about the BNP beyond the fact that it was anti-immigration. They knew nothing about the history or the background of the party's leaders or activists.

The mood in the club was one of sullen resentment. The neighbourhood around them was changing rapidly. Their known world had gone. I remember that one of them had got hold of the Labour manifesto from 1997. There was only a brief reference to immigration but the man read out the words "every country must have firm control over immigration and Britain is no exception". They felt betrayed and voiceless. In their view Labour had not been straight and no-one had asked them whether they wanted a sharp rise in immigration.

Certainly in that club the bond between the white working class and Labour had been broken. They seemed isolated, adrift and in that mood voted for the BNP. They did not particularly like the party. Theirs was a protest vote, a cry to be heard.

Later the Labour MP for Dagenham Jon Cruddas criticised my report. He felt the publicity could benefit the BNP. In fact it had been one of his Labour colleagues, Margaret Hodge, who had drawn our attention to the area when she warned that the shortage of housing for white working class people was driving people into the arms of the BNP. In the event the BNP did well and now have 12 councillors in the area.

It was easy to show the BNP for what they really were. Their election literature did that.

Many of the people I met knew that the BNP was regarded as a racist party but it did not deter them from voting for the party. They did not care because they felt ignored and sidelined. I also recall a comment from a colleague. He said the white working class was probably the only section of society that could be openly abused. They could be called "trash" or "chavs"' and no one objected. What I took away from Barking and Dagenham was the need for the mainstream parties to re-connect to white working families.
patdfb
QUOTE (bobbins @ Oct 23 2009, 3:26) *
If I understand you correctly, your problem is not with any aspect of immigration, but with the general public's irrational media-fuelled fears of immigration. I really don't see what amount of "plain-speaking" from leading politicians can solve that problem.


Plain speaking and getting away from all the hyperbole, confirming what actions, if they must, have them in a straightforward way that is easily accessible to the voters rather than wrapped up in party 'pointscoring' politics. Could help quell much of th hysteria surrounding the issue, even if to begin with it is a tad simplistic.

The same could be said about Europe, take away all the 'myth' and crap that has been built up over the years and being a bit simple, in terms of setting out a basic view, has the potential to help restore some of the faith in politics and politicians.

It would allow a connection on an everyday level rather than being caught up in spin, distraction and trying to appease certain sections of society, rather than society as a whole. Inturn you may find that people have more of a connection with politics rather than going, 'its not for me because they are a bunch of charlatans, thiefs, hypocrites etc etc. I know people who havent voted and will not vote ( not even spoiling their papers if they think no one is worthy) becuase they cant be bothered as they feel they cant change anytghing because politicians cant connect with them. Trying to engaging people who are disinterested, burn out or whatever would be a way of ensuring that least parliament would have to buck up their ideas, rather than the same old, same old, and would least be a start no matter how small the steps.

We are 8 months or less away from a general election and for the first time since I can remember, there is the potential of chucking out the old order, if people can be engaged. No more swinging from Labour to Conservative governments, because that is what is expected ( and bores the shit out of people becuase they percieve they cant change it)
David
QUOTE (patdfb @ Oct 23 2009, 12:14) *
The same could be said about Europe, take away all the 'myth' and crap that has been built up over the years and being a bit simple, in terms of setting out a basic view, has the potential to help restore some of the faith in politics and politicians.


I'm still wondering whatever happened to the referendum on the EU we should have got huh.gif
patdfb
QUOTE (hardcore_harry @ Oct 23 2009, 13:22) *
QUOTE (patdfb @ Oct 23 2009, 12:14) *
The same could be said about Europe, take away all the 'myth' and crap that has been built up over the years and being a bit simple, in terms of setting out a basic view, has the potential to help restore some of the faith in politics and politicians.


I'm still wondering whatever happened to the referendum on the EU we should have got huh.gif


Kerzactly.. it just adds to the distrust and helps create more of an mythos around it.


Say your gunna do something, just effing do it... referendum, half and half pubs ( ive even given up smoking but,), rather than coming up with even more eleaborate crap as to why you havent....
David
Saying that, I doubt a referendum would make much difference, as the Government would likely just go down the same route as the Irish Government did.

They had a referendum in June of 2008, which saw the treaty voted against by the majority.

That would be the end of the story you may think. I'm fairly sure if the vote had been a 'yes' majority we wouldn't have heard anything else about it. It would have been a done deal, right?

Surely the same should apply to a 'no' majority as well.

Think again.

Another vote was held a few weeks ago, which saw a turnout of just over half the population.

This vote declared a 'yes' majority.

Maybe it's a "best of three" deal or something, eh? wink.gif

Or, they simply keep voting until they get the answer they want.
Kiffy
QUOTE (tiger_rick @ Oct 23 2009, 8:52) *
I was expecting Straw to make a tit of himself on immigration after the butchered quote Harry posted before the show but I don't think he did. He's definitely in denial if he genuinely thinks fears about immigration haven't increased BNP support but what he said about it was right. Stuff like putting a cap on population is impossible.

It was a good show. Griffin made an absolute tit of himself. He was shown up totally as a lying bastard who cannot back up any of the things he spews. I thought Waasi was the best guest. She conducted herself well, made good counter arguments and didn't have her head in the sand about key issues.

The only fear I have is how large the proportion of people who, like Harry, somehow feel that Griffin came off well on the show is. All we've heard from the media in the last few days is that British people are intelligent enough to make their own minds up about the BNP. I don't think that is true for a lot of people.


I could be wrong, but from what I remember reading the expenses scandal had far more to do with the BNP getting members in the MEP than anything else.
Essentially, the BNP actually gained less votes this european election than the time before. Their improved standing was nothing with do with extra votes and everything to do with record low turnout. Which can be attributed to the expense scandal.
As far as griffin coming off well on the show? Can't understand how anyone would think that myself. He utterly embarrased himself at every turn. Constantly back peddling and being caught out in direct lies early on. His peddling of "I'm so misquoted, it's so unfair," came apart extraordinarily quickly. His pretending he wasn't with the head of the KKK, swiftly followed by a photo of it, his laughing about holocaust denial. He got destroyed. By his own admissions nazi's hate him for moving the BNP in a more moderate direction, the general population hates him for still being a Nazi, he tried to claim his "Send every last one back," line was to pull the wool over Nazi's eyes - exposing him as a man who is quite happy to lie utterly at the very least.
By the end you could see in his eye's he knew he'd fucked it, his best chance and he'd been utterly destroyed.
I really enjoyed it smile.gif

Granted I'm very anti-BNP an
David
QUOTE (Kiffy @ Oct 23 2009, 15:08) *
By the end you could see in his eye's he knew he'd fucked it, his best chance and he'd been utterly destroyed.
I really enjoyed it smile.gif


Judging by the feedback of actual British people today, i'd say he's far from "destroyed".

Both Sky & BBC news have done features which include public opinion, and ol' beady eye is getting a fair bit of public support.

The BBC admitting that they changed the format of Question Time to work against him is a mistake in my opinion.

Just saw him on Sky News making a challenge to Dimbleby & the BBC to do Question Time again, and do it properly.

He also made a challenge to Jack Straw for a one on one debate, one hour, televised.

I wouldn't have imagined any of those so-called "challenges" being considered in the past, but the viewing figures it would get may change some television channels opinions.

8 million fucking viewers. Has UK politics ever attracted such interest?


Aidancorrigan
The guys a tit and thats it... He was made a mockerey of for his views and what he says and he deserved it... His views have no place in this society.
The King Of Swing
I always thought that Winston Churchill being a bit of a racist cunt was a well known fact.

Anyway.

QUOTE
BBC Gets Hundreds Of Complaints Over BNP

The BBC says it received more than 350 complaints after BNP leader Nick Griffin appeared on Question Time.

The bulk of complaints - more than 240 - accused the BBC of being biased against the BNP, the broadcaster revealed.

Some 100 viewers complained about Mr Griffin being allowed on the programme, while 50 others contacted the BBC to express appreciation of the programme.

The BNP leader himself says his party will be complaining about the bias he considers was shown towards him.

During Question Time, Mr Griffin claimed his party's immigration policy was supported by the majority of the public - and insisted he was not a Nazi.

Facing a hostile audience, he criticised Islam and defended a former head of the Ku Klux Klan.

The visibly nervous Mr Griffin was branded "completely disgusting" by members of the audience as he struggled to articulate his extreme views to a highly critical panel, often resorting to inappropriate laughter.

At one point moderator David Dimbleby snapped at the BNP leader for smiling as he struggled to answer a question about his past denial of the Holocaust.

He was booed as he attacked Jack Straw's father for being in jail for not fighting in the war while his own father was serving in the RAF.

The show opened with a question asking the panel whether it was right that Winston Churchill had been adopted by the BNP.

Mr Griffin said that his party would have been the only one to accept Churchill's views, particularly those on Islam.

One black member of the audience said the MEP was a "disgrace" who was trying to poison the minds of the electorate.

"The vast majority of the audience think what you stand for, your views, are disgusting," he said.

Another audience member added: "You would be surprised how many people would have a whip round to buy you a ticket, and your supporters, to go to the South Pole; it's a colourless landscape, it would quite suit you."

Mr Griffin said that he was being painted as a "monster" by the press who were peddling "terrible lies about him".

Dimbleby put to him: "What are the lies? Were they lying when they said you denied the Holocaust?"

Mr Griffin replied: "I have not got a conviction for denying the Holocaust."

Dimbleby pressed him again about whether he had denied the event before snapping: "Why are you smiling? It's not particularly amusing."

Sky's chief political correspondent Jon Craig said: "It was a propaganda victory, certainly.

"But more likely a propaganda victory for the organisation that staged this TV debate rather than for the BNP leader, Nick Griffin.

"Griffin was exposed on Question Time as a nasty piece of work, with unpleasant views on race, immigration, Islam, homosexuality and Winston Churchill."

The BBC has defended Mr Griffin's appearance on the show, insisting it was "appropriate" to invite him to appear given the level of support his party achieved in the last European elections.

The BNP will have the right to get free television advertising during next year's General Election.

The far-right party will be given at least one party election broadcast in the three weeks before polling day.

Under broadcasting law, any party contesting at least a sixth of the seats in England is entitled to a free broadcast of up to four minutes and 40 seconds.


I wonder what the "facism is bad but ban anyone we don't agree with" brigade have to say about that?

As for Big Nick making a tit of himself well thats what almost always happens to politicians on QT and if Big Nick had not been on there it would have just been the usual lynching of New Labour who have been nothing but a disaster since Comrade Brown took over though Phoney Blair (who looks set to be our first ever EU Dictator....opps I mean President) wasn't much better either.

BionicRedneck
Considering 8 million people watched it, 350 complaints is fuck all. Jan Moir got 20,000 last week.

Anyway, this made me chuckle...


The King Of Swing
HAHA funny pic thumbs-up.gif

As for the complaints it usually only takes about a dozen for the beeb to brick it so 140 complaining about the BNP being bullied is a pretty large amount.

The beeb bottled it plain and simple and changing the format simply to target Nick was the wrong way to go about things and only plays into the victim game for the BNP yet again.
JNLister
Have the BBC actually said they changed the format?

As far as I know, the questions are usually chosen based on what the people in the audience put forward as wanting to ask, in order of how many people ask about a particular topic (with a lighthearted one stuck at the end). It's not hard to imagine that the vast majority of people who wanted to be in the audience for a show with Nick Griffin would ask questions about the BNP. Indeed, back in the summer, they had an edition where every question was about MPs expenses.
nfc90210
QUOTE (Yoghurt @ Oct 23 2009, 9:58) *
QUOTE (tiger_rick @ Oct 23 2009, 8:52) *


...The only fear I have is how large the proportion of people who, like Harry, somehow feel that Griffin came off well on the show is. All we've heard from the media in the last few days is that British people are intelligent enough to make their own minds up about the BNP. I don't think that is true for a lot of people.


Bingo, the general media has sorely overestimated the general intelligence of the native populace. The belief Griffin came off well according to some people in spite of reality is utterly indicative of their support no matter what, and their ill reasoning isn't going to be changed by logic nor fact.


When you're preaching to people’s existing prejudices you don't have to be able to articulate like Barack Obama in order for them to think that you did well. The fact that you're speaking at all can be enough.
Aidancorrigan
The people that thought he came off well are idiots. Honestly did anyone watch it right. How can a guys view change so much in a short time to a non racist view. Sharing a stage with kkk memebers, memebers of his party making stupid comments. The guy doesnt come off well, he wont make it far and his views on islam are wild. As it was said everything they are based on is scare mongering(sp?)

The party hasn't moved on in any way shape or form if you have to say certain things in front of certain people.
JNLister
The thing about the show is that there may well still be people who saw it and still think BNP is a party worth voting for. While that's sad, we've at least established that those people are not responsive to reasoned argument so we can stop wasting time on them and put that effort into making sure you get the tiny increase in turnout (voting for ANY other party) to make sure the BNP never get elected again.
Aidancorrigan
Exactly mate.
BionicRedneck
http://www.slapnickgriffin.co.uk/

Very enjoyable.
King Pitcos
QUOTE
"I spent the entire night with my back turned to him.


QUOTE
I don't know if the cameras picked this up but Griffin was trembling and shaking like a leaf.


She's contradicted herself there, hasn't she?

Also, not apropos of the thread's current topic, but I just watched WWE Superstars and Matt Striker called Tommy Dreamer "the leader of the Labour party."
SpursRiot2012
QUOTE (Aidancorrigan @ Oct 23 2009, 20:53) *
Honestly did anyone watch it right. How can a guys view change so much in a short time to a non racist view.


To be fair, you can change your outlook on life. I used to be massively racist, granted I was 14 or 15 at the time, but nowadays I'm just a right-wing libertarian...if that makes any sense.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.